A quote from the AAIB report… "Aspects of the approved training organisation’s operational management appear to have influenced behaviour in the organisation, contributing to the circumstances of the accident."
Notwithstanding the actions of the pilot, the culture is driven from the top. The management and operational aspects do not reflect well on L3 Harris. What a disgrace for a UK ATO to be referenced in this way… Additionally, CAA Level 2 findings that took months to address? Who on earth in their right would want to train with L3 Harris at Cranfield?
Last edited by glush; 22nd Jul 2022 at 09:39.