Originally Posted by
gordonfvckingramsay
Where do CASA stand if they are made aware of a looming safety problem and then fail to act? Is “we don’t dabble in that type of safety issue” really a valid defence? Would that stand up to legal scrutiny? I thought knowledge of a threat to life, and failure to act on that knowledge would present a problem at every hurdle if you were fronting a coronial inquiry.
I want to know where a safety problem occurs with an industrial issue?
if an incident occurs due to industrial problems creating stresses on an individual, that problem lands in the lap of the individual.
Mental health has become a major issue with all regulators, the regulator will target the individual not the business. Blurring the line between safety and industrial is a long bow to draw.
I have been involved with airlines where individuals knew they were shortly to be unemployed, yet the airline continued to its demise. Should CASA have grounded them before this?
The Australian airline industry has become so insular to global events thanks to government bailouts, it’s time to wake up.
Joyce said QF was screwed if it wasn’t for a bailout.