Originally Posted by
etudiant
Perhaps these countries do not see enhanced NATO capabilities as worthwhile.
There is no logical basis for the 2% threshold
afaik.
Plus as the late Lyndon B Johnson used to say, it is much better to have people inside the tent p**ing out than the other way around.
Then why did they agree to it in 2014? What is the point in having an agreement, that you don’t think is worthwhile? Don’t they have the courage of their convictions to be honest?