Originally Posted by
triadic
For what ASA had proposed 5000ft is not good enough. Industry have been asking ASA for 3000ft coverage for over 2 years and not even a list of locations where the facilities are!
The scale of the 5000ft coverage diagrams is not good enough.
triadic,
I am not saying you are wrong, just clarifying your thoughts;
when you say “
For what ASA had proposed 5000ft is not good enough” are you saying the proposal is flawed based on the ADSB coverage at 5000 ft published by AsA OR is it the definition of the published maps inadequate
and the fact we do not have coverage diagrams below 5000?
/
In essence are you saying the info from AsA is inadequate OR the current ADSB coverage is inadequate to do what is proposed?
Thank you,
Gf