PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Independent RAF
Thread: Independent RAF
View Single Post
Old 11th Feb 2021, 17:53
  #58 (permalink)  
Cyberhacker
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by John LeBrun
An independent RAF is becoming hard to justify. The Royal Navy, with its new carriers and aircraft could easily take on the RAF role on land. The Fleet Air Arm had a number of land bases in the past. As for transport aircraft, the work is done chiefly for the British Army so the army could take that part over. Training could be done at an MOD unit. Central Flying School would remain, as part of the MOD.
[Wah]

I know this is PPRUNE, so I'll keep it aviation... there is limited value (IMHO) of having three aviation arms (four if you include the coastguard). It makes sense to combine them all into one... whether it is called the Air Force, the Air Arm or the Air Corps (or even the Air Guard) does not matter. But Air's standing should be at the same level as Land and Sea.

[/Wah]

But in parallel, why does the Army have so many separate Infantry and Armour/Cavalry "regiments" - a single multi-battalion Corps of Infantry and a single multi-Regiment Armour/Cavalry Corps would make more sense... or even a single, combined, Combat Arms Corps
Cyberhacker is offline