Originally Posted by
BDAttitude
I don't know if there is a proper translation, translator says misdemeanor - but that's too much. Maybe administrative offence? Are you sure nothing else is mentioned?
Many thanks for your research BSAttitude. The only thing I can see that is relevant is that it says "pilot-in-command violated basic rules of the air during the flight" Not sure what the word basic infers.
However Paragraph 44 (1) does mention "3.contrary to Section 5, causes noise during the operation of an aircraft that is stronger than is inevitably required for proper guidance or operation,", which is a reference to noise.
This was an A320 flight at reduced power for takeoff, and i was PIC, but not PF. But that counts for nothing. I too have a feeling that it has to do with the NADPs.