Originally Posted by
Miles Magister
I, in my personal opinion of over 40 years of instructing and unit test flying, strongly disagree with "(E) accept the priority of rolling to wings level first, before reducing power and before pulling."
Actually I may agree with you, just pointing out the controversial nature of some of the guidance material from our (soon not to be) regulatory authority.
AUPRTA revision 2 has "Simultaneously reduce thrust and roll the shortest direction to wings level" but this seems to be missing from revision 3.
If we consider initiating the roll and reducing power as essentially simultaneous I think this can still be interpreted as consistent with the AUPRTA templates, leaving just the EASA GM to FCL.745.A as controversial. It is guidance material not regulation, though I suspect it may have found its way into the training manuals of ATOs approved to train FCL.745.A (since copying the guidance material may be the easiest way to get a training manual accepted by the CAA)
Having said that, the 737 QRH Nose Low Recovery has
• Disconnect autopilot and autothrottle
• Recover from stall, if required
• * Roll in shortest direction to wings level
(unload and roll if bank angle is more
than 90 degrees)
• Recover to level flight:
- Apply nose up elevator
- *Apply nose up trim, if required
- Adjust thrust and drag as required.
Thrust only gets a mention in the last line
Any current TREs / TRIs like to contribute to this thread?