Originally Posted by
cee cee
Right, "The Australian", that explains it.
So you’re suggesting the Australian mis-reported the relevant Minister’s comments to the judicial inquiry about why a particular company was chosen to provide security? The Age reported the same comments! Interestingly didn’t see much about those comments in the ABC though. Why would that be?
The level of confirmation bias based on who did/ did not report a particular thing is surreal. Just as surreal as Victorian Dan supporters banging on about the Ruby Princess as a way of deflecting from systemic, ongoing, multi agency incompetency in the Victorian government.