Originally Posted by
typerated
so you have changed your argument from killing the most to occupying the ground to win- and guess what!
Still wrong!
Perhaps quit while you are losing!
but let me give you some examples to ponder : Czechoslovakia 1938
Singapore 1942
Japan 1945
No change
It’s all part of the same problem, no matter how many of the enemies weapons you destroy you don’t defeat him completely until you kill and / or subjugate / nullify enough of his population, military and civilian, and occupy his territory
Then you can put the instigators of the conflict / war criminals on trial, punish them and maintain a presence in the aggressors country until the threat is eliminated
Worked pretty well with Japan and Germany