Can we say either a no or yes vote is too risky or right or wrong?
If we vote yes will the company retire the 330/380’s (and the LHEA!) and rin us all to the 350/787 or will they stay true to their word?
If we vote no will the company start a Greenfield’s operation or continue to negotiate?
We don’t know the companies plan, so we can’t accurately calculate the risk.
So our choices are based on some facts, counterfactual hypothesis, lots of deception and ‘Gut feeling”.
Considering that the sub conscious makes decisions as well (or better) as your conscious mind and that ‘Tit for Tat’
is an evolutionary stable strategy then someone voting with their ‘head’ (IMHO) is no more correct than someone voting
on emotion.
Calling someones choices ‘a disgrace’ could also be seen as emotional and not thinking with your head.