Originally Posted by
SecretAngel
What Norman and a stack of others are asking for, is for people who want to vote no to explain what they think happens next, if the no vote wins? Do you think QF keeps negotiating for a second, third or fourth round vote? Why do you think QF won't carry through on its threat/promise to set up a new entity, when it's made that statement publicly and to investors?
Thanks. Can you let me know when one of them actually answers the question?
Meanwhile people like birdie have been posting actual FACTUAL numbers here which proves the offer shown at the webinars is in fact a pay rise for a little more work. Yet the NO voters keep wanting to compare them to the beloved 380 conditions on a soon retired fleet.
Lets not forget ladies and gents, not to long ago the majority of you votes YES in EBA 9. EBA10 is a pay rise for current pilots, with the introduction of a new aircraft type (if you wish to fly it).
You can drop the argument that revolves around "a YES vote doesn't guarantee the 350 won't come". It's nothing more than a scaremongering moot point.
Originally Posted by
gordonfvckingramsay
To be clear, I’m saying don’t fall for the threat, a yes vote merely gives them what they want at a lower cost. Whatever happens to the fleet will happen, we’re now haggling over the price and guys who are being spooked are haggling our value down.
And how much do you think our value will go down when a new entity is established and directly competing during EBA negotiations in the future?