Originally Posted by
A little birdie
My point was it’s not quite as the previous poster pointed out. It’s not quite the roster he was talking about and it’s certainly not a pay cut. I’d hate to be doing 180 hours back to back continuously with a couple of ULHs each roster as well. That’s not the intent though.
The deal will get up, or not, on it’s merits but it shouldn’t be blatantly mis-represented.
Ok, where and how please is it been misrepresented?