PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - GT says fatal 737 MAX crashes caused by 'incompetent crew.'
Old 24th Jan 2020, 17:46
  #40 (permalink)  
aox
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 227
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CurtainTwitcher
Hang on, this would be a Boeing friendly "leak"* right GT?

This would be the same Boeing that mocked operators who actually wanted to give their pilots additional training (beyond the one hour iPad course): Bloomberg Report: Boeing Mocked Lion Air Calls for More 737 Max Training Before Crash.

Is this the same Boeing that would allow their own family to travel on the MAX and described the FAA thus:

my bold. Source :The Register What was Boeing through their heads? Emails show staff wouldn't put their families on a 737 Max over safety fears

again from the Boeing chat logs



The same Boeing who also had a hand in suppressing a 2009 Human Factors report on a fatal 737 accident that had a large degree of system design failure in addition to flight crew error and undocumented behaviour with a system relying on a SINGLE CHANNEL failure just like the MAX (Capt's RA triggered autothrottle flair mode causing idle thrust with the same annunciation RETARD that the crew would expect to see at that point in the configuration sequence), they were happy to see the pilots take all the credit for the accident: NYT: How Boeing’s Responsibility in a Deadly Crash ‘Got Buried’

Do I understand exactly who you are now carrying water for GT, the same Boeing? How can you sleep at night?

Source Documents


*Geoffrey Thomas, will you disclose any consideration or benefit in kind, directly or indirectly from Boeing?


The same Boeing that fired the top boss, saying the company had “decided that a change in leadership was necessary to restore confidence in the company moving forward as it works to repair relationships with regulators, customers, and all other stakeholders”.

Whatever the range of facts and opinions, this is the same Boeing that has since then announced it will take longer than previously declared expectations to get the thing back in the air.

Incurring all that extra work doesn't suggest Boeing support for what Mr Thomas is saying.


aox is offline