Originally Posted by
downsizer
I can only go off what I heard mate. They were categorical that those that had left between '15 and the present wouldn't get fixed. Whatever the fix may be. Take it with a pinch of salt. They could of course be using that line to keep people in.
And in my case it works because although I plan to PVR, I would be better off on full '75 rather than the mix of 75/15, so I plan to wait to see the outcomes.
VMT for the info. My thoughts with retention are allied to yours. Was this a verbal brief or has MoD had the audacity to commit this to writing? (PM welcome)
It cost FBU 495K to set a massive legal precedent. I bet you could crowdfund that in under a month. Personal losses due to 15’s illegal introduction add up to over 150K alone.