Originally Posted by
dragon man
I’m thinking that with this unproven ULH flying we should be wanting loss of license payout reduction going from 55 to 60 to 60 to 65. If Qantas are confident there are no long term health effects of this sort of flying then they shouldn’t object.
That the "research" is a PAID commercial "consulting" agreement with Alertness CRC tells everybody all they need to know.
The "research" is not
peer reviewed meaning its "findings" carry ZERO relevance, will be "commercial in confidence" and tightly controlled so it never sees the light of day, unless a duplicitous CASA buy the fumant des tas de merde