Originally Posted by
kaz3g
Offences under the Regs are generally strict liability but not reverse onus.
The old Latin maxim is Affirmati Non Neganti Incumbit Probatio.
Oh!, Dear me, wouldn't it be wonderful if that was truly the case, there would be far fewer AAT cases CASA v XXXX.
And reverse onus of proof is far too prominent --- at least it is mostly spelt out.
Tootle pip!!