Originally Posted by
Sparrows.
No myths, just facts.
Base pay, 75hrs a month or 900hours a year, 3% pay rises over 30 years.
Is that the landed unit cost or a remuneration comparison?
With respect to the earlier post, total unit cost of labour requires more than a simple remuneration comparison based on hourly rate.
That is the reason why those IR types focus your attention on "hourly rate"
As Curtain Twitcher highlighted a simple remuneration comparison ignores many permutations like time in rank.
With respect to Project Bananarama, didn't Tino La Spiv, in a thinly veiled threat to Qantas pilots, suggest that more "investment" in JQ might result unless pilot provide more concessions were forthcoming?
If so Tino, probably best to ignore the landed (total cost) of pilot in seat as that sure isn't what it is claimed to be...