So this is what the apologists are reduced to? Complaining of plagiarism? Tuc has spelled out the literary and legal issues, so I won't repeat them other than to suggest that the apologists club together and raise four quid to read the whole book rather than just the first few free preview pages on Amazon.
That raises a wider question, the motivation of those who have consistently opposed those seeking reform of UK Military Aviation Regulation and Accident Investigation on each and every fatal accident thread on this Military Aviation Forum of the Professional Pilots Rumour Network. Ours is to prevent avoidable accidents. What's theirs?