Originally Posted by
buckshot1777
So if the review findings were already known i.e. there will be no change to the airspace at Launceston, why does the Tranche 3 document at point 1 say:
And make further reference to the same at Tranche 3.1?
Unless I'm missing something -
Yes that’s the point, we are all missing something here. And it’s not just LT, if you look at the completed CASA O.A.R Airspace reviews for the various locations they all have the same findings “status quo” is “fit-for-purpose”, so what could have changed that in April 2019 AsA proposes that everything is up for grabs ?