Originally Posted by
rhoshamboe
I voted no.If you clowns that are screaming for resignations aren't the first to put yourselves forward to lead or serve on the committee you will be displaying the same lack of backbone you accuse the GC of having. If you are not going to put your hand up, stop.
This is a ridiculous comment. The membership deserves to have a GC that represents the membership’s interests. Only 21% of the membership approved of this deal, and yet the Chairman and 65% of the GC endorsed it. That is NOT proportional representation. And before you throw it at me, I’ve done several years on the GC in the last decade, and I’ve never been a part of a failed TA, or even a close one.