Wow, a firm stance from a union previously guilty of contradicting their own agreements. What about failing to represent members because it wasn’t the will of the LGC? But is it really just about the roster and all that overtime they’re paying 50% tax on? Are those driving existing harmoniously with their rearcrew brethren of the same union post the accident nearly 2 years ago? Who’s spinning it and where’s the fake news? The power of the media when you’re the first one to get the ear of the journo..... standby for the incoming questions about the questions and potential subsequent denials. All is not well, but may be worse if that accident report is ever published. Have the interested parties stopped objecting prior to its release or is it being watered down to protect the hierarchy? So many questions. But no answers.