Originally Posted by
Sonikt
Then
this happened!
quote: '
Unbeknownst to investors, the company's historical profit growth was built on an undisclosed and unsustainable foundation of worker exploitation and employee turnover,'
With any company in the face of employee disputes the company will try to 'save face' and minimise the problems it is facing. It did seem like a standard response from FR management when the disputes started. I am sure a more realistic view was given behind closed doors. Most big investors don't look too much at media reports but rather the internal facts so I am curious to how they felt FR was negligent in this case?