Sorry, I am not allowed to post links yet as I don’t have a minimum of 10 posts. But you are looking for Art 7:669 lid 3 Burgerlijk Wetboek.
Thanks, SigWit,. I've had a look and translated (Google
) from Dutch.
I think there COULD be three possible grounds for Ryanair as follows:
a. the lapse of jobs as a result of the termination of the activities of the company or, for a future period of at least 26 weeks, necessarily lapse of workplaces as a result of the taking into account of business economics for efficient operations;
g. a disturbed employment relationship, such that the employer can not reasonably be required to continue the employment contract;
h. other than the aforementioned circumstances which are such that the employer can not reasonably be required to continue the employment contract
But, as you say, (a) stands out.
But thing is, the judge has already ruled it a misuse of power by Ryanair.
Well, all we can do now is wait and see.