Originally Posted by
Hotel Tango
I think you failed to grasp Sobelena's point
Well feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but he/she appeared to be remarking on the fact that,10 days on from the accident, there doesn't seem to be universal agreement on the circumstances:
Originally Posted by
Sobelena
I refer to my post on page 3. I've since been away for a week and on my return find we're now on page 11 and still not agreed on whether it was an undershoot or overshoot!
I simply pointed out that the evidence that's going to resolve that unambiguously (FDR traces, for example) hasn't yet been published.
What do you think he/she meant, and how would you have responded ? You still have time.