Originally Posted by
Denti
The budget for EASA is financed by the general budget of the European Union. Not by membership fees.
Ah, of course, my error. I wonder if there's been any discussion about reducing the central funding going to EASA when the UK drops out and thus reduces the volume of work in EASA.
I wonder also if 3rd Country approval fees go to EASA, or to the EU's central funds. Then again, who cares?
By the way, if it is technically not possible for a UK organisation to have a 3rd Country approval until the UK is a 3rd Country, it makes sense to get all the paperwork done prior to issuing the approval at 0001 on 30th March. I admire EASA's actions in facilitating that if it becomes necessary, and I never thought I would admire anything about EASA. Even the website is user-friendly.