Originally Posted by
henno_b
To remain a member, the UK must recognize the authority of the European Court of Justice because that is the ultimate arbitration authority to EASA. The UK government does not want to accept ANY authority of the EJC, and will also no longer have any influence on the ECJ. Therefore, the UK government does not WANT to stay in EASA.
Norway and Switzerland etc do not have such a chip on their shoulder and accept ECJ, even without having a say in it. It's called pragmatism.
How many times must it be repeated. The UK have requested to stay in EASA and changed their red line on ECJ jurisdiction to accommodate that request.
It is now up to the EU to decide whether they will allow the UK to remain or not.