LB is right. "As well as" leaves CASA free to continue the embuggerance.
for goodness sake get a QC and an experienced public servant to look at what you think you want because the wording is going to be tested in the AAT and Courts.
"as well as" can probably be construed by CASA legal as creating conflicting and unresolvable imperatives. They then invite a judge to prioritise them. The result? The BS CASA safety at all costs mantra triumphs again.
''words matter. in legal circles they don't always mean what you think they mean. legal Precision is vital.
''I also have trouble with "the highest". There are ICAO and EU standards for risk to passengers. For goodness sake use them as the yardstick and force CASA to do the mathematical modeling associated with applying them every time they write a regulation. See the paper referenced in the airspace thread for an example of how it's done by the best in the world.
You want CASA applying international safety norms, not "the highest".