Originally Posted by
DirtyProp
So, let me get this straight: the pax claims his/her "human" right to take matters into his/her own hands and play Hero of the Day but when things go sour he/she refuses the responsibilities and consequences of his/her own actions?
How can you possibly interpret anything I have written as being even remotely equivalent to that position?
For the third time: who's gonna take responsibility for those serious injuries? The carrier or those ordinary, sensitive pax which behaved like cattle?
Our legal system is not without its flaws, but I believe that, on balance, a court hearing from witnesses who were there would,more often than not, make the right call.
I an not privy to the facts and would not presume to make that call from my armchair