Originally Posted by
Gonzo
Is this just not simply that each airpspace change needs a sponsor? If the Airport don’t want to do so, there’s nothing stopping the BGA in developing their own ACP proposal.
FASVIG have done so before.
That is correct, but with the workload that the BGA and the fantastic individuals all over the country supporting them are under to lead the fight against various ACPs, it becomes like a full time job, it might sounds straightforwards to put a counter ACP in but there needs to be the manpower behind it! FASVIG aside we're dealing with professional consultants who have all the time in the world to dream up ACPs! I'm informed that GA is trying to get some professionals in to take some of the load off.