Here's an interesting quandary.
EASA rules require students to have completed all theoretical knowledge training for all subjects before a student can take any examinations for any subjects. That is applied rigidly by some EASA member states, and not so by others, which may or may not have filed derogations.
Several new EASA ECQB questions seem to cross-pollinate over two or three subjects in the same question. There are not many of these at the moment but who knows, that may change in the future and I have been told of a couple of questions of this nature appearing in UK exams.
How do students, who are studying in countries that do not require completion of all course material before taking examinations, answer questions from subject A which contains elements of subject B, which has not yet been studied?
It seems that an increase in this type of question may disadvantage examination candidates from those countries, which do not apply the rules to their original extent.
2close