The change of DFO may well be linked to training, but for what reason?
Do you really think a highly paid person (a non-executive director) would sacrifice a substantial remuneration package almost overnight, merely on a point of principle concerning one sole area of their overall remit? Of course, they wouldn't !!
As to 4468's comment on 'sub-optimal solution', perhaps he/she would care to explain what they mean by it. Not only could using an external ATO save money, but it might yield other unforeseen efficiencies and benefits.
As for feeding Trolls, 'Overstressed' and 'ReallyAnnoyed' seem to be in denial of something. What could that be, the ending of a cosy existence?
Last edited by Pilotless; 2nd Mar 2018 at 08:45.