From Lead Balloon:
An organisation provides information and the information is published in the AIP. 367 days later the organisation has yet to do a review of that information. The organisation is a criminal, even if the published information remains complete and accurate in fact.
This is so "Yes Minister" that it belies belief.
A pox on all of you miserable public service pen jockies that can't even spell the word aviation let alone imagine the concept.
Actually, it is more likely to be the dim-witted CASA Directors that don't have a clue to be able to envisage what is required by the real World of aviation.
The sooner we adopt USA FAA Regulations or even EASA, the sooner we start the healing process.
Our piss-ant CASA operation can't even make a dent in coping with the quantity of aviation engineering, maintenance, airworthiness and operational procedural changes that are being pushed out by competent manufacturers and other authorities worldwide.
Trying to re-invent the regulatory process of the FAA or EASA regulations by issuing independent Australian aviation regulations is incredulous in the face of the incredible complexity and plethora of 21st Century Aviation and the advances that are happening.
You would need a workforce of 20,000 or more qualified and experienced employees to replicate that sort of talent!
Australian Commercial aviation somehow just plows on with the job in spite of CASA and poor old GA just flounders and struggles (smothered?) along in the wake somehow.
You might disagree..?