LVP:effect of failed or downgraded eqpt. on approaches
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my seat
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends on the Company LVP , but in general, Approach Lights are not required to work for a Cat3 approach. Reason of course is that on a Cat 3, you will not even see any approach lights as DA is for a Cat 3A over the threshold.
Approach lights ARE required for Cat2 approaches, fully operational.
Approach lights ARE required for Cat2 approaches, fully operational.
Only half a speed-brake
Makes sense. Lights go off, standby power source does not kick in, you go around if visual reference lost. Unlucky, but safe enough. No need nor benefit in mandating a minima increase.
Last edited by FlightDetent; 13th Jan 2016 at 20:32. Reason: Clarified. Hopefully.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Light go off, you go around
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my seat
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16024,
Not in ours it doesn't.
If not mentioned on the charts, then normal cat1 minima apply for approach lights inop or on sby. Don't restrict yourselves when not necessary...
As I said before, if the RWY is Cat3 equipped, you can do a CAT3 as no approach light system is necessary for such approach.
Not in ours it doesn't.
If not mentioned on the charts, then normal cat1 minima apply for approach lights inop or on sby. Don't restrict yourselves when not necessary...
As I said before, if the RWY is Cat3 equipped, you can do a CAT3 as no approach light system is necessary for such approach.
Only half a speed-brake
16024:
EASA Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Part-SPA
AMC7 SPA.LVO.100 Low visibility operations
EFFECT ON LANDING MINIMA OF TEMPORARILY FAILED OR DOWNGRADED EQUIPMENT
My mind was focused on the LVP part, yours probably on the CAT I, hence the discord. Take care.
EASA Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Part-SPA
AMC7 SPA.LVO.100 Low visibility operations
EFFECT ON LANDING MINIMA OF TEMPORARILY FAILED OR DOWNGRADED EQUIPMENT
- Standby power for approach lights: No effect
My mind was focused on the LVP part, yours probably on the CAT I, hence the discord. Take care.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flight Detent:
I agree 100% with your edit of post #5!
Despegue:
Here's the link:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...01:0238:EN:PDF
On page 75 there's a table, and for NALS your cat1 DH remains at 200' but your required rvr is 1200m. I agree that it is a bit confusing unless we are clear whether we are talking about standby power failure or complete loss of lighting.
I agree 100% with your edit of post #5!
Despegue:
normal cat1 minima apply for approach lights inop
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...01:0238:EN:PDF
On page 75 there's a table, and for NALS your cat1 DH remains at 200' but your required rvr is 1200m. I agree that it is a bit confusing unless we are clear whether we are talking about standby power failure or complete loss of lighting.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Formerly resident of Knoteatingham
Posts: 957
Received 116 Likes
on
57 Posts
The question was re the effect of unserviceable standby power for Cat 1 and Cat 2 Procedures wasn't it?
Using EASA regs the answer is simple and as follows;
Cat 3 and Cat 2. No effect.
Cat 2 OTS and CAT 1. Minima as for NALS.
OR, Did the OP mean having to operate using SBY Power for the ALS?
In which case;
Cat 3B No DH. No Effect
Cat 3B with DH and Cat 3A. Not allowed for DH above 50 feet.
Cat 2. Not Allowed
Cat 2 OTS and Cat 1. Minima as for NALS
Using EASA regs the answer is simple and as follows;
Cat 3 and Cat 2. No effect.
Cat 2 OTS and CAT 1. Minima as for NALS.
OR, Did the OP mean having to operate using SBY Power for the ALS?
In which case;
Cat 3B No DH. No Effect
Cat 3B with DH and Cat 3A. Not allowed for DH above 50 feet.
Cat 2. Not Allowed
Cat 2 OTS and Cat 1. Minima as for NALS