Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

LVP:effect of failed or downgraded eqpt. on approaches

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

LVP:effect of failed or downgraded eqpt. on approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th January 2016 | 02:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Abu dhabi
LVP:effect of failed or downgraded eqpt. on approaches

hi,what is the effect of standby power for approach lights for CAT1 & CAT2 approache minima?
Nitin3286 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 00:25
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Uk
For Cat 1/2 no effect but Cat 3 not allowed
whitelabel is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 00:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: In my seat
Depends on the Company LVP , but in general, Approach Lights are not required to work for a Cat3 approach. Reason of course is that on a Cat 3, you will not even see any approach lights as DA is for a Cat 3A over the threshold.

Approach lights ARE required for Cat2 approaches, fully operational.
despegue is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 09:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Europe
EU-OPS: unserviceability of standby power for app lights has no effect on landing minima.
Gryphon is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 13:35
  #5 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Makes sense. Lights go off, standby power source does not kick in, you go around if visual reference lost. Unlucky, but safe enough. No need nor benefit in mandating a minima increase.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 13th January 2016 at 20:32. Reason: Clarified. Hopefully.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 18:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: uk
Light go off, you go around
Not quite. Remember this is about the standby power system, which is listed in the "Failed or Downgraded Equipment" table somewhere in your part A. Also in there will be a NALS minima table (No approach lights) which more or less tells you to use increased Cat1 minima. No need to go around if you can see it.
16024 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 18:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: In my seat
16024,

Not in ours it doesn't.
If not mentioned on the charts, then normal cat1 minima apply for approach lights inop or on sby. Don't restrict yourselves when not necessary...

As I said before, if the RWY is Cat3 equipped, you can do a CAT3 as no approach light system is necessary for such approach.
despegue is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2016 | 19:51
  #8 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
16024:
EASA Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Part-SPA

AMC7 SPA.LVO.100 Low visibility operations
EFFECT ON LANDING MINIMA OF TEMPORARILY FAILED OR DOWNGRADED EQUIPMENT
  • Standby power for approach lights: No effect

My mind was focused on the LVP part, yours probably on the CAT I, hence the discord. Take care.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2016 | 16:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
I believe there is some confusion with
Standby power Inop for approach lights and Approach lights inop.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2016 | 14:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: uk
Flight Detent:
I agree 100% with your edit of post #5!

Despegue:
normal cat1 minima apply for approach lights inop
Here's the link:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...01:0238:EN:PDF

On page 75 there's a table, and for NALS your cat1 DH remains at 200' but your required rvr is 1200m. I agree that it is a bit confusing unless we are clear whether we are talking about standby power failure or complete loss of lighting.
16024 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2016 | 14:34
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 696
From: Brit living in Malaysia
The question was re the effect of unserviceable standby power for Cat 1 and Cat 2 Procedures wasn't it?

Using EASA regs the answer is simple and as follows;

Cat 3 and Cat 2. No effect.

Cat 2 OTS and CAT 1. Minima as for NALS.

OR, Did the OP mean having to operate using SBY Power for the ALS?

In which case;

Cat 3B No DH. No Effect

Cat 3B with DH and Cat 3A. Not allowed for DH above 50 feet.

Cat 2. Not Allowed

Cat 2 OTS and Cat 1. Minima as for NALS
BANANASBANANAS is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.