Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737-300 vs 700 Energy management

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737-300 vs 700 Energy management

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2012 | 18:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Europe
B737-300 vs 700 Energy management

B737-300 vs 700 Energy Management on approach

What is max attainable descent angle possible in the following configurations assuming idle power and no wind.

Clean 250
250 SB Flight Detent
250 SB Flight Detent + gear
210 SB Flight Detent
210 SB Flight Detent + gear
200 Flaps 5
200 Flaps 10
180 Flap 5
170 Flaps 10
150 Flaps 15 + gear
Flaps 30 FAS
Flaps 40 FAS
MilPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2012 | 00:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
a 300 vs a 700 ????

What the hell are you asking here?

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 1st June 2012 at 00:59.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2012 | 01:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Europe
What the hell are you asking here?
The 300 is capable of a slightly steeper descent in some of those configurations at least. I just want to know the descent angles for the mentioned configurations.
If somebody knows the numbers for just the 700 or just the 300 I would be happy with them as well.

Just in order to know what extreme to go to when you are kept high on arrival.
MilPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2012 | 02:04
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 1
From: FUBAR
Think a lot will depend on whether you are discussing 300w vs 700w, or 300 vs 700w.

Don't think number crunching will answer your Q.

For sure the 700 will be harder to get down, & ++++ if you are discussing in comparison to a non-wingleted (new word I invented? ) 300.

Don't think you can solve this with numbers, fly it & see.

I have just gone from 800 to 800 Short Field Perf, that is a "big" difference, no Full Ext till F30, Bugger ! they killed my best Intermediate App friend. . . F10

Last edited by captplaystation; 1st June 2012 at 02:09.
captplaystation is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2012 | 02:44
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Europe
captplaystation,
300 vs 700w

Regarding the 800 SFP:
Can you still maintain around 4.5-5 degree with idle Gear + F15. Even without the Slats fully extended.

So do you remember the F10 numbers:

200 Flaps 10
170 Flaps 10
MilPilot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.