Pilot Safety Culture Survey
Moderator
Thread Starter
Pilot Safety Culture Survey
Posted on colleagues behalf and approved to post Survey
Make your voice heard, to inform the future regulation of our profession.
Please take just 10 minutes to contribute to this important survey.
https://lse.ut1.qualtrics.com/jfe/fo...mypp9deK7A37Lv
Make your voice heard, to inform the future regulation of our profession.
Please take just 10 minutes to contribute to this important survey.
https://lse.ut1.qualtrics.com/jfe/fo...mypp9deK7A37Lv
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is an entirely confidential and unique opportunity for us to report our views at a time of great change for our profession. EASA rule making relies on pilot feedback and this is our chance to provide it.
Further reading can be found on the ECA website: https://www.eurocockpit.be/pages/new...ure-for-pilots
The survey closes on Feb 22nd.
Further reading can be found on the ECA website: https://www.eurocockpit.be/pages/new...ure-for-pilots
The survey closes on Feb 22nd.
Last edited by bazilbutler; 22nd Jan 2016 at 21:39.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brussels
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Safety culture? What safety culture?
I wrote to four different agencies and to their senior management, detailing a reason why aircraft flight decks burst into flames. And not one of them even replied. And as far as I can see, nothing has been done.
I wrote to four different agencies and to their senior management, detailing a reason why aircraft flight decks burst into flames. And not one of them even replied. And as far as I can see, nothing has been done.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brussels
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm interested in knowing which incidents you refer to where flight decks "burst into flames".
Accident: Egyptair B772 at Cairo on Jul 29th 2011, cockpit fire
Corendon
Accident: Corendon B738 at Antalya on Oct 14th 2012, cockpit fire
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tewksbury Mass USA
Age: 80
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
8 other Cockpit Fires
COCKPIT ONLY. (Source Ref;‘Survey of 75 fires from June 1983 to October 29, 2015’).
BRIEFS ONLY.
For Full texts see NTSB query at Link > http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/month.aspxSearch by dates.
For SDRs see FAA SDR query at Link > FAA :: SDR Reporting [Service Difficulty Report Query Page] Insert SDR # in ‘operators control field’ and run query.
6/16/10. Delta 767. Cockpit, Fire Damage to sidewall panel.Cause unknown.NTSB Accident/Incident Report # ENG10IA038.
5/16/10. United 757.Fire in cockpit at windshield terminals.Cause; loose terminals.NTSB Accident/Incident Report # ENG10IA029.
3/1/09. Comair CRJ. CL600.Fire Through Fuselage.Cause; Unknown. SDR # and Link > CA090312013The cockpit area continued to burn, resulting in an oval shaped 18 inch hole that had burned through the upper cockpit canopy area.
6/28/08. ABX freighter, 767.Fire Damage. Top crown aft of cockpit. Hull Loss (destroyed).NTSB Accident/Incident Report # DCA08MA076. Cause; short circuit in oxygen hose spring.
9/22/06. Delta 777.Fire lower corner co-pilot front window.No cause.NTSB Accident/ Incident Report # DCA06WA075.
2/28/04. Atlantic SoutheastCRJ CL600.Fire Penetrating Fuselage aft of Captain side window. No cause. SDR # and Link > ASOA200900352.
10/1/00. Continental MD-80.Fire behind jump seat. Cause; Electrical - chaffing.NTSB Accident/Incident # ATL01IA001. “The examination of the airplane disclosed a 2 by 1 1/2 inch fire-damaged hole in the left jump seat wall.”
8/8/00. AirTran DC-9-32. Fire behind Captains seat. Cause; Wire Arcing.Hull write off –destroyed. NTSB Accident/Incident # DCA00MA079. “Extensive wire damage in electrical panel behind captain’s seat and blistering of the aircraft skin."
Also seeNTSB Safety Letter Recommendation Letter # A-01-83 through –87.
BRIEFS ONLY.
For Full texts see NTSB query at Link > http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/month.aspxSearch by dates.
For SDRs see FAA SDR query at Link > FAA :: SDR Reporting [Service Difficulty Report Query Page] Insert SDR # in ‘operators control field’ and run query.
6/16/10. Delta 767. Cockpit, Fire Damage to sidewall panel.Cause unknown.NTSB Accident/Incident Report # ENG10IA038.
5/16/10. United 757.Fire in cockpit at windshield terminals.Cause; loose terminals.NTSB Accident/Incident Report # ENG10IA029.
3/1/09. Comair CRJ. CL600.Fire Through Fuselage.Cause; Unknown. SDR # and Link > CA090312013The cockpit area continued to burn, resulting in an oval shaped 18 inch hole that had burned through the upper cockpit canopy area.
6/28/08. ABX freighter, 767.Fire Damage. Top crown aft of cockpit. Hull Loss (destroyed).NTSB Accident/Incident Report # DCA08MA076. Cause; short circuit in oxygen hose spring.
9/22/06. Delta 777.Fire lower corner co-pilot front window.No cause.NTSB Accident/ Incident Report # DCA06WA075.
2/28/04. Atlantic SoutheastCRJ CL600.Fire Penetrating Fuselage aft of Captain side window. No cause. SDR # and Link > ASOA200900352.
10/1/00. Continental MD-80.Fire behind jump seat. Cause; Electrical - chaffing.NTSB Accident/Incident # ATL01IA001. “The examination of the airplane disclosed a 2 by 1 1/2 inch fire-damaged hole in the left jump seat wall.”
8/8/00. AirTran DC-9-32. Fire behind Captains seat. Cause; Wire Arcing.Hull write off –destroyed. NTSB Accident/Incident # DCA00MA079. “Extensive wire damage in electrical panel behind captain’s seat and blistering of the aircraft skin."
Also seeNTSB Safety Letter Recommendation Letter # A-01-83 through –87.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
world vs europe !
I canot imagine an exclusive European safety survey! European registration ? European owner ? Inside Europe flight ? European pilots ? Aso.
We already know that European Union wants to destroy UNO and ICAO.
Only a worldwide ICAO survey is able to improve really air safety.
We already know that European Union wants to destroy UNO and ICAO.
Only a worldwide ICAO survey is able to improve really air safety.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi roulishollandais,
The introduction page says that the survey is targeted at commercial pilots who fly and are based in Europe.
It aims to assess the current safety culture for pilots in Europe and to validate a safety culture tool in order to measure it reliably.
This is the first study that attempts to look at pilot safety culture across the whole of Europe. It is by far the largest survey on this topic to date and is quite an undertaking.
It is run by an independent body (The London School of Economics) so it has no ulterior agenda.
Internet forums will only achieve so much. If you're a European pilot take 10 minutes to submit your opinion for scientific judgement and exposure.
The introduction page says that the survey is targeted at commercial pilots who fly and are based in Europe.
It aims to assess the current safety culture for pilots in Europe and to validate a safety culture tool in order to measure it reliably.
This is the first study that attempts to look at pilot safety culture across the whole of Europe. It is by far the largest survey on this topic to date and is quite an undertaking.
It is run by an independent body (The London School of Economics) so it has no ulterior agenda.
Internet forums will only achieve so much. If you're a European pilot take 10 minutes to submit your opinion for scientific judgement and exposure.
This is not a very scientific approach. As per Roul&, there is no control over who or where the contributions come from.
Culture involves what an organisation / pilot does, not something which can be assessed with a survey. How can an open forum study equate procedural statements defining what an organisation will do (likely responses), against what actually happens in operations. The important aspect of culture is what an organisation does when no one is looking.
bazil N.B. ‘… a collaboration of the LSE, the European Commission, and EUROCONTROL” – link #3.
If this survey were to be used by EASA then help; particularly if it anything like other ‘surveys’ used in the justification of regulatory action.
Culture involves what an organisation / pilot does, not something which can be assessed with a survey. How can an open forum study equate procedural statements defining what an organisation will do (likely responses), against what actually happens in operations. The important aspect of culture is what an organisation does when no one is looking.
bazil N.B. ‘… a collaboration of the LSE, the European Commission, and EUROCONTROL” – link #3.
If this survey were to be used by EASA then help; particularly if it anything like other ‘surveys’ used in the justification of regulatory action.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brussels
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is run by an independent body (The London School of Economics) so it has no ulterior agenda.
Anyone else notice that this questionnaire was not designed by pilots or engineers? If you are not asking the right questions, the survey is worse than useless. And this one was pretty useless as useless go - ambiguous questions that will result in misleading answers, and therefore result in the wrong policy proposals being made.
I had a friend once who did an investigation into Metro usage at major cities. And after six months of intensive 'research' she concluded that more people used the Metro between 07:30 and 09:00 and again between 17:00 and 18:00. Kerrrchhingggg.
Don't expect anything from the imbeciles who inhabit academia.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: dn105au
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I`m with silvertate here. Academics live in a very narrow, one dimensional world. Aviation is exactly the opposite, multi-dimensional and relies on the safe interaction of scores of individuals to make every flight, a safe flight. Let`s not trivialise our industry by completing a questionaire with skewed, misleading and irrelevant questions.
Unfortunately this is now the modus operandii of Governments and Regulatory Authorities. You were consulted, so we can go ahead and do exactly what we intended to do in the first place. We commisioned a survey!!!!!!
Sorry, academics are overpaid, underworked ego`s on legs.
Unfortunately this is now the modus operandii of Governments and Regulatory Authorities. You were consulted, so we can go ahead and do exactly what we intended to do in the first place. We commisioned a survey!!!!!!
Sorry, academics are overpaid, underworked ego`s on legs.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I totally agree with silver state and attic7.
In appearance the modern method is to fly a sequence of designed FCOM procedures and automation could do it in low cost flights - Wealthy people will pay much to keep human pilots ! -
But in fact the pilot is at the best, drawing the interfaces of these sequences during the whole flight. And we know that we have NEVER flown two similar flights.
In appearance the modern method is to fly a sequence of designed FCOM procedures and automation could do it in low cost flights - Wealthy people will pay much to keep human pilots ! -
But in fact the pilot is at the best, drawing the interfaces of these sequences during the whole flight. And we know that we have NEVER flown two similar flights.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
