PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st Jul 2011, 13:01   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I bucked one and Tim bucked two
Posts: 51
Koreanair A380 tail strike NRT

Rumor of KAL tail strike/engine contact in NRT on 21 July. Anyone validate the rumor?
Keylime is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 13:15   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 619
Scratched already? They've only just got it!
Kalium Chloride is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 13:22   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tickawarra
Posts: 77
Kleons flying the aircraft?
Yobbo is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 13:28   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 283
And is that the reason Korean's cancelled its Bangkok A380 service?
Jazz Hands is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 13:51   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 635
NRT-Again

I am sorry to hear that the close call comes closer. About 3 years ago a bankend landing with cross wind in a B777-200ER, less then two years ago a 1.000ft tail scrape on landing with a B777-300, a while later a Kangeroo style landing at NRT in the same type. Now the shiny new A380..... outch. But if you look into the Far-East you will see a discussion that KAL-Pilots want to get rid of many ExPats as possible, maybe safer for them to be away.....
B737NG is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 14:07   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,068
You may be jumping the gun there B737NG. Do you know for sure it wasn't an ex-pat flying this A380?
Hotel Tango is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 14:13   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Far East
Age: 35
Posts: 56
Yeah, it's true.

Japanese news showed the actual aircraft, an A380, which showed signs of scratching damage on engine No. 4 during the post flight inspection. It didn't show the actual damage so I don't know the extent. However, the same news also reported that the damage was determined to be limited, and the aircraft flew back as scheduled with pax.
japanam is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 14:20   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,209
Anyone know the bank angle required to drag the outboard engines?
misd-agin is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 14:30   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: rwy25l - just right of papi
Posts: 68
RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971
RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973

Weather did not look to stable.
ARNSpoty is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 14:56   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 635
Hotel tango

Quote:
You may be jumping the gun there B737NG. Do you know for sure it wasn't an ex-pat flying this A380?
I know that there where no Expats in TLS for the initial training. There where also a significant number of Pilots sent back to Seoul as unsuitable (Airbus voice) to train for the A380 as there was: Lack of knowledge of the Airbus product and the language barrier.

The only non Korean you find at the moment in that Airplanes are Airbus Instructors sitting as monitoring Cockpit members either right or back seat.

Now trust me, you have not even the tip of the Iceberg here......
B737NG is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 15:11   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 283
Japanese media says KE701 came in and scratched the base of its engine at while landing at Narita. Airport closed for 20min to inspect the runway, no problems found, aircraft cleared to depart back to Seoul.

Most shocking bit was 168 on board. Should've used a 737.
Jazz Hands is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 17:06   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glass Mountains
Age: 58
Posts: 6
Quote:
KE701 came in and scratched the base of its engine at while landing at Narita. Airport closed for 20min to inspect the runway, no problems found, aircraft cleared to depart back to Seoul
Good on the NRT airport authorities to check on FODs. About 6 or 7 years ago, a KAL B744 pranged the engine on landing and the skipper kept quiet about it after the walkaround for the return flight hoping that it will be foisted onto the next unfortunate guy! Unfortunately this piece of work was an expat!
cheapendale is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 18:51   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 123
Quote:
"RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971
RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973

Weather did not look to stable."
12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable. If you can't handle that kind of wind you have no business sitting in the cockpit of any commercial jet.
bcflyer is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 19:48   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: not at home
Posts: 29
Incident: Korean A388 at Tokyo on Jul 21st 2011, engine pod strike

picture on the same page:
B-HVY is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 20:29   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 305
Quote:
RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971
Quote:
12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable
No, but windshear tends to destabilise a bit..
golfyankeesierra is online now   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 20:56   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CLE
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by misd-agin View Post
Anyone know the bank angle required to drag the outboard engines?

...quite a bit.
asc12 is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 21:15   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 65
Posts: 151
Someone know the max crosswind for this baby ?
DJ77 is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 21:27   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 458
wow - looking at the picture linked above it wasn't a smooth landing...
atakacs is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 22:03   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Airbusses in general don't like gusty or turbulent conditions & can be testing at times. Autothrust can be all over the place & if the crew had minimum time on type would find it particularly challenging. The max crosswind for landing on the A380 is 40 knots.
PACIFIC BARON is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jul 2011, 22:22   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 366
Quote:
RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973
Quote:
12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable. If you can't handle that kind of wind you have no business sitting in the cockpit of any commercial jet.
How's reading the full METAR? I can see crosswind components ranging from 5 to 30 kts.
172_driver is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 19:15.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".