Koreanair A380 tail strike NRT
Rumor of KAL tail strike/engine contact in NRT on 21 July. Anyone validate the rumor?
|
Kleons flying the aircraft?
|
NRT-Again
I am sorry to hear that the close call comes closer. About 3 years ago a bankend landing with cross wind in a B777-200ER, less then two years ago a 1.000ft tail scrape on landing with a B777-300, a while later a Kangeroo style landing at NRT in the same type. Now the shiny new A380..... outch. But if you look into the Far-East you will see a discussion that KAL-Pilots want to get rid of many ExPats as possible, maybe safer for them to be away.....
|
You may be jumping the gun there B737NG. Do you know for sure it wasn't an ex-pat flying this A380?
|
Yeah, it's true.
Japanese news showed the actual aircraft, an A380, which showed signs of scratching damage on engine No. 4 during the post flight inspection. It didn't show the actual damage so I don't know the extent. However, the same news also reported that the damage was determined to be limited, and the aircraft flew back as scheduled with pax. |
Anyone know the bank angle required to drag the outboard engines?
|
RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971
RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973 Weather did not look to stable. |
Hotel tango
You may be jumping the gun there B737NG. Do you know for sure it wasn't an ex-pat flying this A380? The only non Korean you find at the moment in that Airplanes are Airbus Instructors sitting as monitoring Cockpit members either right or back seat. Now trust me, you have not even the tip of the Iceberg here...... |
KE701 came in and scratched the base of its engine at while landing at Narita. Airport closed for 20min to inspect the runway, no problems found, aircraft cleared to depart back to Seoul |
"RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971 RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973 Weather did not look to stable." |
|
RJAA 130400Z 22019KT 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/21 Q1006 WS R16L BECMG 22020G32KT RMK 1CU030 A2971 12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable |
Originally Posted by misd-agin
(Post 6585675)
Anyone know the bank angle required to drag the outboard engines?
...quite a bit. :ooh: |
Someone know the max crosswind for this baby ?
|
wow - looking at the picture linked above it wasn't a smooth landing...
|
Airbusses in general don't like gusty or turbulent conditions & can be testing at times. Autothrust can be all over the place & if the crew had minimum time on type would find it particularly challenging. The max crosswind for landing on the A380 is 40 knots.
|
RJAA 130330Z 22017G32KT 180V250 9999 FEW030 BKN/// 32/22 Q1006 WS R16R WS R16L NOSIG RMK 1CU030 A2973 12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable. If you can't handle that kind of wind you have no business sitting in the cockpit of any commercial jet. |
Quote: 12-15kt gusts are hardly enough to call the weather unstable. If you can't handle that kind of wind you have no business sitting in the cockpit of any commercial jet. How's reading the full METAR? I can see crosswind components ranging from 5 to 30 kts. |
bcflyer....IMO, your statement is armchair quarterbacking at best. Have you been into NRT (or similar windshear susceptible airports) under these conditions with little or no time on the aircraft you are piloting?...windshear is felt right through the flare here. It requires considerable skills and as it appears beyond the capabilty of this crew. There are aircraft (xwind) limits and company limts. This approach is not as simple as you make it sound.
|
X-wind landing limit for A380 is 40kts.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.