How long are your landings?
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be interested in how a tailwheel pilot could land without properly flaring, Fox.
As far as SSD and LA's discussion goes, there is an argument for both, initially I would say the instructor should see that the pilot concerned controls the nose onto the ground properly and maintains directional control down to a reasonable speed, once the student has demonstrated that OK, then you can do the landings without the nosewheel having to go down - but this should only be a real consideration if you have a marginal runway, on a long enough one the time saving is negligable.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Extending flaps causes pitch up>>etc. Not necessarily.
Depends where the wings are. My low wing taildragger has a second trim tab operated by the flap lever. This thing is spring loaded to pull it up as the flaps are retracted, the operating cable is underneath. Therefore flaps down, trim tab down, elevator up to counter pitch down.
As for reconfiguration. My method:- Throttle up, drag flaps up, tail up if it isn't already. In that order. Faffing with flaps first while running out of runway does not achieve anything except running out of runway.
In the 152:- Throttle up, flap lever fully up then down to the first stop, keeping the training wheel off the ground. For the pedantics, thumb hits the carb heat at full throttle in both cases (just).
I have, only once, dragged mine off the ground with full flaps, full tanks, and a pie eater, missed the trees by not a lot but it still flew, perhaps a hot day and more pies may have been less funny.
Perhaps I should mention the runway is 600metres grass with a distinct slope up at the last 150metres. If the method works there then it will work just as well on 6000 metre Tarmac.
Depends where the wings are. My low wing taildragger has a second trim tab operated by the flap lever. This thing is spring loaded to pull it up as the flaps are retracted, the operating cable is underneath. Therefore flaps down, trim tab down, elevator up to counter pitch down.
As for reconfiguration. My method:- Throttle up, drag flaps up, tail up if it isn't already. In that order. Faffing with flaps first while running out of runway does not achieve anything except running out of runway.
In the 152:- Throttle up, flap lever fully up then down to the first stop, keeping the training wheel off the ground. For the pedantics, thumb hits the carb heat at full throttle in both cases (just).
I have, only once, dragged mine off the ground with full flaps, full tanks, and a pie eater, missed the trees by not a lot but it still flew, perhaps a hot day and more pies may have been less funny.
Perhaps I should mention the runway is 600metres grass with a distinct slope up at the last 150metres. If the method works there then it will work just as well on 6000 metre Tarmac.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True, but in a trike the main thing is to land gently on the mains with the nose wheel held off. That's what takes time to learn. Once the aeroplane is in that position continuing to hold off the nose wheel until the elevator runs out of authority is easy, so 'going' on a touch and go before the nosewheel has landed surely has great benefit in fitting as many 'landings' as possible into each hour, rather than the backtrack and take off that might well be required if one waits until the nose wheel has landed.
If a student cannot maintain pitch attitude as intended, and the centerline, then yes, they need more practice, and perhaps instruction. Dumbing down a skill to accommodate lacking skills is not good - expect that skill to be developed and maintained. If a pilot cannot keep a tricycle aircraft on the centerline they have no hope of flying a taildragger - in which all pilots two generations ago learned to fly. If a pilot cannot maintain pitch during a flap reposition they should worry about a gusty day.
To me, an aircraft has not landed until all of its wheels are on the ground.
Taxi with flaps was an absolut NoGo on the 172 during my initial training, as this was near coast and one of the usual squalls would lift and blow you off taxiway.
I'd be interested in how a tailwheel pilot could land without properly flaring
I like the idea that the main wheels touching is considered a part of a landing, and not the point at which the pilot says "I'm down", and stops flying!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Greater London Area
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If a pilot cannot keep a tricycle aircraft on the centerline they have no hope of flying a taildragger - in which all pilots two generations ago learned to fly. If a pilot cannot maintain pitch during a flap reposition they should worry about a gusty day.
Absolutely agree on pitch keeping during flap reposition and yes, both ways. Extending flaps appears to be taught quite well, but I sometimes feel getting 'em in in flight not so well. This weekend we had a trip to very short fields and what I saw after short&soft field takeoffs was sometimes scary.
If the purpose of the landing was to teach approach and landing, and a touch and go is intended I can be content that the nosewheel (or tailwheel) does not touch, and indeed if this is the outcome, I think that the demonstration of skill needed to do that is great compensation for not just dropping the nosewheel on, or threepointing.
I suggest that if wind conditions are such that the use of 10 or so flap while taxiing a 172 landplane could increase risk of being blown around over no flaps, perhaps it's too much wind for the average pilot.
I agree that a full flare is going to result in a three point landing in a taildragger - which is not my personal choice. I find that one of the taildraggers I regularly fly (172 taildrgger) can be brought to stall warning, and still wheel landed nicely. This is my preferred method in that plane.
I like the idea that the main wheels touching is considered a part of a landing, and not the point at which the pilot says "I'm down", and stops flying!
I see lots of circuits flown by students under instruction. Bomber circuits, too fast approaches and flat landings seem to be the norm these days. A particularly worrying trend is retracting all the flap after touching down on a touch and go.
I watched one student recently, bounce a landing on a solo circuit. He decided a go-around was a good call, and promptly retracted all of the flaps at around 15ft before going for the throttle.
Interesting outcome.
I think we're entering an era where students are being taught badly by Instructors who were taught badly. Slippery slope.
I watched one student recently, bounce a landing on a solo circuit. He decided a go-around was a good call, and promptly retracted all of the flaps at around 15ft before going for the throttle.
Interesting outcome.
I think we're entering an era where students are being taught badly by Instructors who were taught badly. Slippery slope.
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Greater London Area
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bad circuit flying always has been a privilege of student flyers ;-). It has to improve over time though and the instructors have to have a very close eye on it. The spread in instructing skills is indeed feeling increased, covering everything from the old and bold ones, over the buts intuition airmen, all the way down to quick-fancy-dirty buttoneers. Btw: retracting flaps completely after touched down is in many ATO handbooks now, so formal no error.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Btw: retracting flaps completely after touched down is in many ATO handbooks now, so formal no error.
In single engine Cessnas, should you desire to effectively control pitch attitude on the runway, 10 - 15 flap out will give you a little more control. So that's where I leave them until I'm clear of the runway, airborne safely, or no longer taxiing over rough ground - as the case may be....
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since then I have NO issues determining what happens first on a go-around or a touch and go
Last edited by Steve6443; 18th Apr 2016 at 11:09. Reason: spelling :(
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps "what to do first" depends on the runway length and aircraft.
Flying out of a short grass strip in a low wing aircraft with a direct control flap lever like a handbrake handle, throttle first is no problem. Slow moving electric flaps, high wing with hefty pitch up tendencies is different.
One size fits all doesn't work.
Flying out of a short grass strip in a low wing aircraft with a direct control flap lever like a handbrake handle, throttle first is no problem. Slow moving electric flaps, high wing with hefty pitch up tendencies is different.
One size fits all doesn't work.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Gloster,UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The first aircraft in which I had the pleasure in being a part owner was a Cessna 150.
Electric 40 degree flaps, aerodynamics of a wall, and an engine that was inadequate for a lawnmower.
I could land it on a handkerchief sized field. Not a hope of getting it out in the same length.
An interesting habit was that you had to keep a close eye on the flap lever, as it would happily wind everything back home again. You could land on 40 flap, but a go around needed to be on 15. Power on. Flick the flap lever, muscle around doing the trim change and carb heat. Flap overshoots to zero. Climb rate vanishes. Add that flap. It overshoots and winds towards 30. Trim becomes heavy, trees get closer. Sort it all out and decide that it's not a short field plane after all.
Electric 40 degree flaps, aerodynamics of a wall, and an engine that was inadequate for a lawnmower.
I could land it on a handkerchief sized field. Not a hope of getting it out in the same length.
An interesting habit was that you had to keep a close eye on the flap lever, as it would happily wind everything back home again. You could land on 40 flap, but a go around needed to be on 15. Power on. Flick the flap lever, muscle around doing the trim change and carb heat. Flap overshoots to zero. Climb rate vanishes. Add that flap. It overshoots and winds towards 30. Trim becomes heavy, trees get closer. Sort it all out and decide that it's not a short field plane after all.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well understood, know your aircraft, mine has similar problems. Flap lever has two positions, the pawl and slots are somewhat worn, short final at 150 ft, no wind, quickly select full flap, swap hands, close throttle, 50ft, loud bang as flap lever pops out, instant flaps to zero, pitch up, bugger! Grab flap lever, land left handed using flap lever as an airbrake. I must fix that.
I see lots of circuits flown by students under instruction. Bomber circuits, too fast approaches and flat landings seem to be the norm these days. A particularly worrying trend is retracting all the flap after touching down on a touch and go.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1.3 Vs !!!!!!!!!!
As Fireflybob says "approach speed seems a common factor ".
I see all sorts of reasons used to increase the approach speed, the common ones being increased weight & gusty conditions as well as "that's what they do on airliners " ( that usually from the orange jet wannabes ).
I discovered most of this while having a coffee in the lounge of a flying club while getting warm having just changed yet another badly flat spotted tyre.
The student congregation around the TV watching airline cockpit videos seemed to regard the flight manual approach speed as a minimum to build apon to get more safety with speed rather than a speed calculated by the aircraft manufacturer for an approach at MLW.
As they usually fly the aircraft well below the MLW I offered the opinion that to achieve 1.3 Vs they might well consider reducing the approach speed below that quoted in the flight manual.
While the approach speed reduction to achieve 1.3 Vs might be far too radical for flying instruction it did bring home the fact that at usual operation weights the flight manual speed will provide adequate gust protection as it is bound to be above the aircraft's true 1.3 Vs.
I see all sorts of reasons used to increase the approach speed, the common ones being increased weight & gusty conditions as well as "that's what they do on airliners " ( that usually from the orange jet wannabes ).
I discovered most of this while having a coffee in the lounge of a flying club while getting warm having just changed yet another badly flat spotted tyre.
The student congregation around the TV watching airline cockpit videos seemed to regard the flight manual approach speed as a minimum to build apon to get more safety with speed rather than a speed calculated by the aircraft manufacturer for an approach at MLW.
As they usually fly the aircraft well below the MLW I offered the opinion that to achieve 1.3 Vs they might well consider reducing the approach speed below that quoted in the flight manual.
While the approach speed reduction to achieve 1.3 Vs might be far too radical for flying instruction it did bring home the fact that at usual operation weights the flight manual speed will provide adequate gust protection as it is bound to be above the aircraft's true 1.3 Vs.
Moderator
Thread Starter
It's also worth note that Vs is a 1 G speed. If you fly at less than 1 G, there will be a commensurate reduction in Vs. On approach you might be flying just a little less than 1 G at times, and certainly have the option to reduce pitch into a gust, which will give you a momentary increased margin against stall.
I had occasion recently to demonstrate a slipping glide approach with a fairly steep turn to final. The instructor riding with me was startled by the steep turn, but I reminded him that I was slipping will above stall speed, and not pulling any G.
I had occasion recently to demonstrate a slipping glide approach with a fairly steep turn to final. The instructor riding with me was startled by the steep turn, but I reminded him that I was slipping will above stall speed, and not pulling any G.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's also worth note that Vs is a 1 G speed. If you fly at less than 1 G, there will be a commensurate reduction in Vs. On approach you might be flying just a little less than 1 G at times, and certainly have the option to reduce pitch into a gust, which will give you a momentary increased margin against stall.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Having nearly done that at least once, I prefer nosewheel down (naturally, not pushed), flaps up, steer back to somewhere near the centreline, all nice and relaxed and deliberate, then the "go" bit of "touch and go" may be an option if there's enough runway left.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- which way is the aircraft likely to yaw when full power is applied?
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vienna
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@SSD: unless I am mistaken, you are correct for the Chipmunk and Yak with prop rotation being counter-clockwise, but not for most aircraft (such as C150s, but also Cubs) which will yaw to the left when applying power.
I am not sure that the two aircraft you mention are the best examples to base the reply to "where does the aircraft yaw when power is applied" on, especially in the context of student pilots.
I am not sure that the two aircraft you mention are the best examples to base the reply to "where does the aircraft yaw when power is applied" on, especially in the context of student pilots.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- which way is the aircraft likely to yaw when full power is applied?
Errm.... to the right.
Errm.... to the right.
For many other airplanes, whose props rotate clockwise (Continental/Lycoming/Pratt & Whitney/Franklin/Allison powered, among others) expect the aircraft to swing to the left with power application. The affect in airplanes like a Cessna 185 or SM1019 can be pronounced. Cessna 206/210, and high powered Cherokees also, but less so.