Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Visual Approach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Sep 2014, 08:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Baleares
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Visual Approach

Hello to all, would love some help to this question:

During a Visual Approach in controlled class C who is responsible to maintain separation: the pilot or the ATC ?

I thought the pilot but the exam site says ATC.

many thanks
baleares is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 08:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you're being 'controlled' ATC is responsible for separation.


However, that doesn't absolve you of responsibility to keep good lookout.
AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 11:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK...... BOTH!

VFR separated from IFR in Class C & D, but NOT separated from other VFR traffic.

From CAA web site:

Class C

IFR and VFR flights are permitted

All flights are provided with air traffic control service

IFR flights are separated from other IFR flights and from VFR flights.


VFR flights are separated from IFR flights and receive traffic information in respect of other VFR flights.

Class D

IFR and VFR flights are permitted

All flights are provided with air traffic control service

IFR flights are separated from other IFR flights and receive traffic information in respect of VFR flights

VFR flights receive traffic information in respect of all other flights.
xrayalpha is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 13:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure what it's supposed to be but I would lean towards saying it is the responsibility of the pilot.

ATC should provide separation from other IFR traffic but will not separate you from VFR traffic, or at least is not obliged to.

The other thing that comes to mind is at a slight tangent, but I find it fairly common to ask for a visual approach and for ATC to say 'do you have the A320 on a 6 mile final in sight?" and then "cleared visual approach behind the landing A320, recommended spacing is xnm" which puts the separation between two IFR flights on the pilot following AFAIK.
OhNoCB is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 14:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As XA said, however -

Do you mean a VFR approach, or and IFR Visual approach?

If VFR -

You are under a control service, so have to follow ATC instructions. ATC will separate you from IFR traffic typically by route and/or level restrictions (eg track via A and B; not above 2000' etc) or, if the weather permits by visual separation (the controller has both a/c in sight & can maintain sep or following a/c has lead a/c in sight & can maintain sep).

Other VFR a/c, you will just receive tfc info, although that could also come with instructions like "join downwind lefthand rwXX. You are no2 to a C172 late downwind left"

*simplified for brevity.

If you mean an IFR visual approach, then you will be separated from everyone.



Rules of exactly how a controller may separate do vary slightly from country to country, however, so your best bet to get things straight in your mind is a visit to your friendly local ATC unit. Don't forget to go armed with biscuits and/or cakes!

AP
aluminium persuader is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 16:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A "visual approach" is part of an instrument approach procedure and therefore you are flying under IFR rules. Otherwise it would be a VFR approach.
In class C the controller is responsible for all separation between IFR traffic and other IFR and VFR traffic.
Had it been class D the controller would only be responsible for separation from other IFR traffic and not VFR traffic.
lasseb is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 19:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Well in the UK (now including Scotland!) we have no Class C below FL195,
and also no airfields above FL195 so the problem does not occur here.


Disclaimer.... Other countries may have different class C airspace.


.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 19:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lasseb
A "visual approach" is part of an instrument approach procedure and therefore you are flying under IFR
lasseb in Copenhagen has it.

baleares asked:

During a Visual Approach in controlled class C who is responsible to maintain separation: the pilot or the ATC ?
As far as the UK is concerned; from CAP493:
Visual Approach

An approach by an IFR flight when part or all of an instrument approach procedure is not completed and the approach is executed with visual reference to terrain. (ICAO)
Within controlled airspace, standard separation shall be effected between such aircraft and other IFR and/or Special VFR aircraft.
In Class C airspace, controllers shall provide separation between:
1. IFR flights,
2. IFR flights and VFR flights.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2014, 20:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tr_no 688
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a distinction between "provide" and "responsible for" ? They mean different things in a literal sense of course.
Lone_Ranger is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2014, 09:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As said above, you are still flying under IFR during a visual approach.
So the controler must seperate you from all other traffics, which means keep you far enough acoording to his rules which are rather strict.
The pilot remains always responsible for collision avoidance, even if separated from other aircrafts.
Separate aircrafts means give them instructions so that the separation minimums will be achieved.It's the responsability of the controller, as you don't have the means to do that by yourself.
Collision avoidance means using all available ressources to avoid collision, that's always the crew's responsability

If you say "cancel IFR", then the controler still have to separate you from IFR traffic but not from VFR traffic in class C airspace.
That explains why from time to time a visual approach will be refused by the controller, because he thinks it will be difficult for him to maintain the separation minimums between you and other VFR traffic. In that case say "cancel IFR" and you will approach visually, and don't forget to log the last minutes of the flight under VFR.

Last edited by 172510; 21st Sep 2014 at 10:50.
172510 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2014, 09:49
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Baleares
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for all the help

baleares is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2014, 10:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 172510
from time to time a visual approach will be refused by the controller, because he thinks it will be difficult for him to maintain the separation minimums between you and other VFR traffic
I think you mean IFR. In Class C there is no requirement to separate 'cancelled IFR' (=VFR) and VFR, but there is a requirement to separate 'cancelled IFR' (=VFR) from IFR.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2014, 10:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 172510
from time to time a visual approach will be refused by the controller, because he thinks it will be difficult for him to maintain the separation minimums between you and other VFR traffic
I think you mean IFR. In Class C there is no requirement to separate 'cancelled IFR' (=VFR) and VFR, but there is a requirement to separate 'cancelled IFR' (=VFR) from IFR.
As long as you remain IFR, even during a visual approach, the controler must seprate you from VFR and IFR.
If you cancel IFR, you become VFR, and hence the controler does not have to separate you from other VFR.
172510 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2014, 12:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
172510, apologies, disregard my #12 post, I didn't read your (pre-edit) #10 post properly. I agree with you. More medicine required...
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2014, 04:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you are cleared for a visual based on following traffic ahead, you will have to maintain your sep from the traffic you are following, provided you have reported it in sight and will maintain visual sep.

and you can get a visual approach at an airport that doesn't have an instrument approach procedure.
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2014, 10:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A visual approach in FAA is IFR, but usual separation minima are now suspended. You're responsible for your own separation as long as you stay visual with either preceding traffic, or the rwy. Note - you do not have to have rwy in sight to be able accept a visual approach. All you need is preceding traffic in sight.

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publ...C/atc0704.html
AdamFrisch is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.