Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Conversion from PA28 to Cessna 152

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Conversion from PA28 to Cessna 152

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Feb 2014, 18:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you really need an instructor to change from a PA28 to a C150? i think not. These are PPLs not students!
Pace, how many PPL conversions/checkouts have you done? I can now jump into just about any single and fly it OK without reading the POH (if there is one I DO read it, but have flown aircraft that do not actually have one), but remember being very concerned converting just after qualifying and think that is the norm for most!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 18:27
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone ever bought a car at a car auction in the winter (dark) then had to drive it out of their car park before it gets locked up, drive through a busy town trying to find the light switch, wiper switch, the window switch cos some prat left them open, adjust the seat, all without the chance to see things in daylight? Then find the fuel warning light on & have 10miles to go before you find a filling station? But you arrive home with the radio blaring, a full tank, all lights on, windows shut etc. what is the problem in broad daylight flying a slightly different aeroplane? Attitude! Feel! Get on with it! Or am I being bloody minded?
Crash one is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 18:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is one difference between Electric Flaps and Lever Flaps...


The transition time for Electric flaps is about 4 seconds for each stage
of flap. With the Handle, you can go from full flap to none in less than
a second (especially if it slips out of your fingers!).


So on a Cessna, for a go-around or T+G, Its just one movement of your right hand Right to Left over the Flaps, Mixture, Power, and Carb Heat. By the time you have reached the carb heat, the flaps will have almost finished their transit.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 18:44
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pace, how many PPL conversions/checkouts have you done?
I have trained pilots up for a Citation SIC ratings and signed them off and sat in with numerous PPLs on a variety of singles and piston twins.

But as stated have literally years back had the keys thrown at me on complex singles I have never flown and got on with it.

Some time with the POH, Some time sitting static in the aircraft examining every switch and then flown off sometimes into IMC with such aircraft.
Its no big deal and I am nothing special

I really do think its either money making by the training establishments or there are some pretty incompetent pilots around.
As for a PPL yes PPL going from a PA28 TO c152 ??? its a bit like driving a ford fiesta and needing instruction to drive a volkswagen polo. Your not going from a ford Fiesta to a formula 1 Car.

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 21st Feb 2014 at 19:01.
Pace is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 19:02
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone ever bought a car at a car auction in the winter (dark) then had to drive it out of their car park before it gets locked up,
its a bit like driving a ford fiesta and needing instruction to drive a volkswagen polo.
Again, it depends on your experience - if you have done this a number of times, no problem. IF you have just passed your licence then you will be very nervous doing either and probably would like someone next to you - Also, of course, you are talking flying clubs that have minimum requirements and realistically are talking about an hour checkout - even with my experience I would not expect to go to an flying club that does not know me and be allowed to fly their aircraft with much less than a 45 min checkout!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 19:09
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foxmouth

Again, it depends on your experience - if you have done this a number of times, no problem. IF you have just passed your licence then you will be very nervous doing either and probably would like someone next to you - Also, of course, you are talking flying clubs that have minimum requirements and realistically are talking about an hour checkout - even with my experience I would not expect to go to an flying club that does not know me and be allowed to fly their aircraft with much less than a 45 min checkout!
I appreciate that if you turn up at a flying club unknown they will want some sort of checkout. Sadly while many licensed pilots are competent many are totally incompetent and I would be unhappy sending my nearest and dearest up for a flight with them (can think of quite a few who fill that category)

Having done 45 minutes in a PA28 and determined you are well up to speed and competent I see no reason why they should demand another checkout on an equal aircraft like a 150. Unless their motives are to do with money.

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:17
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pace,

Well, using my incorrect user name after having been put right before is either deliberately insulting or careless ignorance! I feel very insulted!

Personally I would agree that a conversion for an experienced pilot from Piper to Cessna should need very little, but I think in real life you will be hard pushed to find a club that will NOT require a full hour conversion as a minimum. For inexperienced pilots most DO need this and I think your experience might blind you to how poor some can be! I did point out though that most schools should be able to do the conversion WITH the club checkout. More realistic for a Pa28 pilot would be to do an hour checkout with conversion and then a few circuits to satisfy them you are still ok on the Pa28.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:20
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, the OP, if anyone can remember him, told us that he had 80 hours and inferred that the PA28 was the only aircraft he had flown.

Matt.

I hope you managed to gain some useful info from this thread dispite the bickering.

MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 21st Feb 2014 at 20:22. Reason: Spelling
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:22
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foxmoth

Whoops done it again i know you won't believe me but totally unintentional at least its given me an embarrassed laugh and I need a laugh just now

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would not mind, but it is an aircraft type, so would expect anyone who knows aircraft to get it right!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:26
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its me miles away while typing sorry FOXMOTH maybe change the aircraft name to FoxMouth ???
Pace is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 20:33
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was once given a very stern rebuke by an elderly lady doctor when I referred to her aircraft as a Foxmoth.

'This, young man, is a Hornetmoth! not a Foxmoth!' (Long time since I was called a 'young man')

You probably know who I mean

MJ
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 21:17
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FOXMOTH maybe change the aircraft name to FoxMouth ???
Really thing you should wash your mouth out for that. Anyway, bit difficult given that dH is no longer going and those that hold the ticket would not be interested.
I was once given a very stern rebuke by an elderly lady doctor when I referred to her aircraft as a Foxmoth.

'This, young man, is a Hornetmoth! not a Foxmoth!' (Long time since I was called a 'young man')

You probably know who I mean

MJ
Yes, I know the lady in question, and yes, a very different aircraft, flown and liked them both - and I think I have been called "young man" by her as well, but a few years ago, sadly she is no longer with us!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 21:30
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is only one plane worse than a C152 and that's a C150. Both are nasty little aircraft. They have wacking great engines, drink fuel like they have a leak yet are barely capable of dragging themselves into the sky. It is most unlikely you'll be able to take two adults and sufficient fuel to do anything more than taxiing. Take more time, save more money but stick to the PA28.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 21:38
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilt you have forgotten to mention that other abortion the Aerobat.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 21:43
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a bit negative to the Cessna - personally I would not go for Piper OR Cessna - To my mind there are many other better options, but for clubs/schools they make sense and it is then a case of what fits what you are trying to achieve, if a C150/2 fits the bill and the price is right, go for it!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 22:15
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cessna 150/152s, and Piper PA28s for that matter, 'do exactly what they say on the tin'. They are safe, stable, simple aeroplanes that are virtually indestructible in the training role.

It's not really fair to criticise them for being dull and boring.

MJ
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 22:22
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not really fair to criticise them for being dull and boring.
Yes it is - they ARE dull and boring, and I see no reason NOT to criticise them for that! A bit like the Top gear team being asked to review the Fiat 500!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 22:33
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hahaha

Foxmoth. But they were designed to be like that, and they do it very well! I even feel the need to defend 'that abortion' the Cessna Aerobat. Elevator so heavy at speed that you needed two hands to pull 6G, but in it's time, probably introduced more people to aerobatics than any other type.

MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 21st Feb 2014 at 22:43. Reason: Punctuation
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 23:18
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aye but there is an option which isn't dull and boring in the same class which doesn't have all the nasty's designed out of it.

The PA38 tomahawk.
mad_jock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.