Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

EASA & Engine age

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

EASA & Engine age

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th July 2008 | 16:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 235
Likes: 3
From: Down South, preferably inverted
EASA & Engine age

I'm currently looking at an aeroplane with a Lycoming half life engine which was zero timed in 1995...(13 years)

I'm sure I've seen something about "12 year life" with regard to EASA regs, but I thought it was only concerning bringing an aeroplane onto the EASA land register and not if it already lives on the G reg...

Could someone please provide references to the discussion paper/legislation etc that talks about EASA not liking engines over 12 years old even if they haven't reached TBO, so that I can clarify the situation.


Thanks

MG
Mad Girl is offline  
Reply
Old 14th July 2008 | 18:16
  #2 (permalink)  
'India-Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
CAP 747, Appendices 1-3, GR 24 - my documents are dated 2005 so things may have changed but I doubt it. You can go to 12 years+20%. Doesn't matter however if you're not going to hire it out. You can just keep going beyond that.

Gipsy Major engines not applicable (in fact it may be all Gipsies) as the manufacturer didn't publish a service life! So if you're looking at a Chipmunk you don't need to bother (yet - I'm sure it's only going to be a matter of time)

I'm sure proper engineers will be along to correct me if I'm wrong - I've just seen it from an owner's perspective so far.
 
Reply
Old 14th July 2008 | 19:12
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
India-Mike

You have coverd that very well!
A and C is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2008 | 19:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,143
Likes: 5,739
From: Falling off the end of the thread
As said above, you can actually read it all here ( current version)........
Scroll down to appendix 1 then GR24 for all the details.


http://www.caaerg.org.uk/docs/33/CAP747.PDF

One thing to check that a lot of people miss is Engine hoses, in the dim and distant you used to repeatedly pressure check them after an inital period then 3 yearly..... Lams changed this to replace at manufactures recommended so a PA28 they need to be replaced at 1000 hrs but a Cessna 152 is at Engine change...... so beware, they can cost a bit......

If needed, we buy ours direct from the USA from this Company

PHT Aircraft Hose Kits, Hose and Fittings

It is where CSE Ltd used to buy theirs from, except cutting them out of the food chain Halved what we were paying for Hoses........ A and C might like that link... you can have them in a week
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2008 | 20:34
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Most custom made Teflon 1500psi WP hoses cost about £40.

That U.S. firm is slightly cheaper (before shipping is taken into account) but I have used Saywell International (Worthing, UK) for hoses and they were about £40, custom made in Saywell's hose shop. Those were top spec Teflon hoses which have no life limit on them (on the TB20, anyway). Anybody can buy from Saywell, direct.

What can be expensive is if you need hoses with unusual fittings - they can be 5x dearer - but I don't think Cessna/Piper use any of those. Socata do have a few...

What is the situation with EASA Part M on engine life? Isn't there a special band 1000-2000kg?
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2008 | 21:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: UK
DONT repeat DONT whatever you do try and put a current EASA registered aircraft on the British register. The nitpicking and frankly obscure and ludicrous regulation they can find to charge you lots more money are unbelievable. We were all just beginning to think EASA would stop a lot of CAA stupidity. Dont you believe it they have had decades to perfect there pot of gold and they aint giving up for a long time yet!
WorkingHard is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2008 | 22:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,143
Likes: 5,739
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Agreed about the TB20 but unless something has come out from the manufacturer as in the TB20, or a SI or the like has been issued you will still be obliged to fit standard hoses and comply with LAMS ( below ) or LAMP

Flexible fuel and oil hoses pressure test.
Next due:
Note: In accordance with type design organisation pressure testing
recommendations but in either case only until the ultimate service life, if stated, is
achieved.
CHK 72 Months
from new,
then every
36 Months
or See Note

though Lycoming have an SI that covers Engine Hoses, you then have to be careful as to what is Engine and what is deemed Airframe hoses and has they been approved for use on it.


NutLoose is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.