Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK's P-8s 'under threat'?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK's P-8s 'under threat'?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jan 2017, 20:19
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
UK's P-8s 'under threat'?

Headline in the Mirror (a UK tabloid newspaper):
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing
The paper 'can reveal' that
Britain is relying on Donald Trump for new RAF spy planes to hunt Russian submarines lurking off the UK coast
The paper explains that this is because the UK chose to order the aircraft through the US 'foreign military sale' system rather than directly from Boeing, and it adds that the President Elect has already "clashed with" Boeing.
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online

An MOD spokesperson said:
A foreign military sale with the US allows us to get the capability we need, in the timeline we want, while securing best value for the UK taxpayer. Backed by our £178 billion equipment plan, we will receive the first UK P-8A Poseidon before the end of the decade.
Any PPRuNErs able to suggest whether this is a serious problem or just tabloid headline-grabbing?

airsound

airsound is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2017, 20:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: various
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airsound
Headline in the Mirror (a UK tabloid newspaper): The paper 'can reveal' thatThe paper explains that this is because the UK chose to order the aircraft through the US 'foreign military sale' system rather than directly from Boeing, and it adds that the President Elect has already "clashed with" Boeing.
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online

An MOD spokesperson said:Any PPRuNErs able to suggest whether this is a serious problem or just tabloid headline-grabbing?

airsound

As you say, this is nothing more than tabloid headline-grabbing. As an aside, It is very disappointing to see such naivety from the LD Defence spokesperson.

RB
RandomBlah is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2017, 20:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odiham
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the pressure on the defence budget (see associated thread), this could provide a convenient excuse for politicians and the MoD alike. After all we've done without them for 8 (?) years now!
Chinny Crewman is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2017, 21:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
I agree it is a non-story tabloid speculation.


The P-8 seems mostly on track and budget and I would see it as the perfect type of program President Elect Trump would support: It creates/keeps good US jobs, is not overly gold plated, is a sensible adoption of a proven airframe, and is replacing a the Orion which most everyone agrees is in need of replacement.


The Foreign Military Sales angle is likely not an issue either. I don't think the US is directly funding the UK P-8 buy. I believe Mr. Trump will likely pursue positive relations with the UK, and will be happy with the UK buying all sorts of systems.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2017, 23:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
DT seems keen on Boeing
Davef68 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 07:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was interesting to note the recently released timescales, and a little disconcerting. Back in the old MPA thread there was a lot of traffic related to possible in service dates, with even pessimists talking of 2018/19. Now it seems we are talking of quote one ac in UK by back end of 2020 unquote.

Any one who knows procurement is going to be having one thought when they read that....money. In other words that seems to be a budget necessitated timescale, for an item which, is at least partially, off the shelf kit (yeah I know, not internally yada yada).

Even if the tortured timescale is not just down to available dosh and is as much related to restoring the whole capability (and training operators) it still represents at least a nagging worry at this stage, because this is a real thing...

Given the pressure on the defence budget (see associated thread), this could provide a convenient excuse for politicians and the MoD alike. After all we've done without them for 8 (?) years now!
We all know how politicians think and behave, any old excuse will do.

Whilst it might not be time to fret too much (don't want to be excused of being overly pessimistic - fat chance lol) I'm not sure I'd be be planning my life round it if I was one of those involved, not without a Plan B at least.

On that note, some of these US seedcorners will be into/close to their fifties come 2020. Good luck trying to shepherd them into jobs/postings they are less than keen on.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 08:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The original seedcorn trawl was for those with a minimum remaining in service time of 7 years. That will expire by the time the jets arrive in the UK (2020). It is also true that many who spend 2 tours in the US just don't come back.
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2017, 08:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Presumably the authors and lib dem spokeswoman didnt understand that pretty much every piece of military equipment bought from the US is sold under the auspices of the FMS system?
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 18:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Something positive to start the year...
Additional three British and seven American P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft ordered

Boeing has been awarded a $1.2bn contract for the manufacture and delivery of 10 Lot 9 full-rate production P-8A aircraft, seven for the US Navy and three for the Royal Air Force.

The UK intends to procure 9 of the aircraft in total and had already ordered two. This brings the orders up to 5.
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 21:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rivet Joint was bought under FMS. Benefit is you get exactly the same as the US, all the publications and support including future US modifications. Not sure if this is the case with P8 but I would suspect that USDOD is the Design Authority, not Boeing. This could be seen as an advantage.
dragartist is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 21:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by The Old Fat One
It was interesting to note the recently released timescales, and a little disconcerting. Back in the old MPA thread there was a lot of traffic related to possible in service dates, with even pessimists talking of 2018/19. Now it seems we are talking of quote one ac in UK by back end of 2020 unquote.
Which recently released timescales and when, and where does that quote come from? As recently as November the officially stated position was that deliveries will start in 2019 and be complete by the end of 2021.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 07:49
  #12 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Steady on chaps, look before you post. This thread was dormant for twelve months and we have people responding to old posts as if yesterday.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 09:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
Steady on chaps, look before you post. This thread was dormant for twelve months and we have people responding to old posts as if yesterday.
Good point well made Nav.

Happy New Year all . . .
Brian W May is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 12:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
Steady on chaps, look before you post. This thread was dormant for twelve months and we have people responding to old posts as if yesterday.
Good point. And given that point, it shows just how utterly stoopid the early predictions were about a Trump presidency. The actual facts totally contradict those doom and gloom predictions.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 17:10
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah yes - his ex-closest confidant saying meetings between his people and the Russians was "treasonous"

makes R M Nixon look like Mr Obama.....................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 17:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,200
Received 395 Likes on 245 Posts
Harry, comparing a paranoid crook to a naïve fool seems an odd juxtaposition, but I am drifting from the topic of the thread, which is that the P-8 seems to be alive and well despite attempts to distract/divert, and no the P-8 was never under threat.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2018, 14:45
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The UK intends to procure 9 of the aircraft in total and had already ordered two. This brings the orders up to 5."

And we could do with 18-20.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 00:09
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
DT seems keen on Boeing
Does he?
Is that why he wants to cancel the order for 2 new build 747s for AF1 duites which were ordered during the Obama era?
chevvron is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 00:19
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Does he?
Is that why he wants to cancel the order for 2 new build 747s for AF1 duites which were ordered during the Obama era?
Old news Chevron. President Trump already declared victory by getting the cost down on the AF1 program, and the Air Force issued the initial contract for the design for the conversion of the two airframes a few months ago.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2018, 14:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Does he?
Is that why he wants to cancel the order for 2 new build 747s for AF1 duites which were ordered during the Obama era?
For the record, Boeing received a contract from USAF to purchase two "white tail" 747-8I originally built for a Russian company. So the next Air Force Ones will have started out as Russian aircraft. USAF got a really sweet deal on the planes. But the real money is not in building the airframes. The real money will be in modifying them. Boeing is almost certainly going to get that deal. And hopefully it'll happen here in San Antonio. That's where the current VC-25s and E-4s undergo depot maintenance/mod.
KenV is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.