UK's P-8s 'under threat'?
Thread Starter
UK's P-8s 'under threat'?
Headline in the Mirror (a UK tabloid newspaper):
The paper 'can reveal' that
The paper explains that this is because the UK chose to order the aircraft through the US 'foreign military sale' system rather than directly from Boeing, and it adds that the President Elect has already "clashed with" Boeing.
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online
An MOD spokesperson said:
Any PPRuNErs able to suggest whether this is a serious problem or just tabloid headline-grabbing?
airsound
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing
Britain is relying on Donald Trump for new RAF spy planes to hunt Russian submarines lurking off the UK coast
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online
An MOD spokesperson said:
A foreign military sale with the US allows us to get the capability we need, in the timeline we want, while securing best value for the UK taxpayer. Backed by our £178 billion equipment plan, we will receive the first UK P-8A Poseidon before the end of the decade.
airsound
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: various
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Headline in the Mirror (a UK tabloid newspaper): The paper 'can reveal' thatThe paper explains that this is because the UK chose to order the aircraft through the US 'foreign military sale' system rather than directly from Boeing, and it adds that the President Elect has already "clashed with" Boeing.
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online
An MOD spokesperson said:Any PPRuNErs able to suggest whether this is a serious problem or just tabloid headline-grabbing?
airsound
New RAF Poseidon spy planes "at the mercy" of Donald Trump over US deal with Boeing - Mirror Online
An MOD spokesperson said:Any PPRuNErs able to suggest whether this is a serious problem or just tabloid headline-grabbing?
airsound
RB
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odiham
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the pressure on the defence budget (see associated thread), this could provide a convenient excuse for politicians and the MoD alike. After all we've done without them for 8 (?) years now!
I agree it is a non-story tabloid speculation.
The P-8 seems mostly on track and budget and I would see it as the perfect type of program President Elect Trump would support: It creates/keeps good US jobs, is not overly gold plated, is a sensible adoption of a proven airframe, and is replacing a the Orion which most everyone agrees is in need of replacement.
The Foreign Military Sales angle is likely not an issue either. I don't think the US is directly funding the UK P-8 buy. I believe Mr. Trump will likely pursue positive relations with the UK, and will be happy with the UK buying all sorts of systems.
The P-8 seems mostly on track and budget and I would see it as the perfect type of program President Elect Trump would support: It creates/keeps good US jobs, is not overly gold plated, is a sensible adoption of a proven airframe, and is replacing a the Orion which most everyone agrees is in need of replacement.
The Foreign Military Sales angle is likely not an issue either. I don't think the US is directly funding the UK P-8 buy. I believe Mr. Trump will likely pursue positive relations with the UK, and will be happy with the UK buying all sorts of systems.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was interesting to note the recently released timescales, and a little disconcerting. Back in the old MPA thread there was a lot of traffic related to possible in service dates, with even pessimists talking of 2018/19. Now it seems we are talking of quote one ac in UK by back end of 2020 unquote.
Any one who knows procurement is going to be having one thought when they read that....money. In other words that seems to be a budget necessitated timescale, for an item which, is at least partially, off the shelf kit (yeah I know, not internally yada yada).
Even if the tortured timescale is not just down to available dosh and is as much related to restoring the whole capability (and training operators) it still represents at least a nagging worry at this stage, because this is a real thing...
We all know how politicians think and behave, any old excuse will do.
Whilst it might not be time to fret too much (don't want to be excused of being overly pessimistic - fat chance lol) I'm not sure I'd be be planning my life round it if I was one of those involved, not without a Plan B at least.
On that note, some of these US seedcorners will be into/close to their fifties come 2020. Good luck trying to shepherd them into jobs/postings they are less than keen on.
Any one who knows procurement is going to be having one thought when they read that....money. In other words that seems to be a budget necessitated timescale, for an item which, is at least partially, off the shelf kit (yeah I know, not internally yada yada).
Even if the tortured timescale is not just down to available dosh and is as much related to restoring the whole capability (and training operators) it still represents at least a nagging worry at this stage, because this is a real thing...
Given the pressure on the defence budget (see associated thread), this could provide a convenient excuse for politicians and the MoD alike. After all we've done without them for 8 (?) years now!
Whilst it might not be time to fret too much (don't want to be excused of being overly pessimistic - fat chance lol) I'm not sure I'd be be planning my life round it if I was one of those involved, not without a Plan B at least.
On that note, some of these US seedcorners will be into/close to their fifties come 2020. Good luck trying to shepherd them into jobs/postings they are less than keen on.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The original seedcorn trawl was for those with a minimum remaining in service time of 7 years. That will expire by the time the jets arrive in the UK (2020). It is also true that many who spend 2 tours in the US just don't come back.
Presumably the authors and lib dem spokeswoman didnt understand that pretty much every piece of military equipment bought from the US is sold under the auspices of the FMS system?
Something positive to start the year...
Additional three British and seven American P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft ordered
Additional three British and seven American P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft ordered
Boeing has been awarded a $1.2bn contract for the manufacture and delivery of 10 Lot 9 full-rate production P-8A aircraft, seven for the US Navy and three for the Royal Air Force.
The UK intends to procure 9 of the aircraft in total and had already ordered two. This brings the orders up to 5.
The UK intends to procure 9 of the aircraft in total and had already ordered two. This brings the orders up to 5.
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rivet Joint was bought under FMS. Benefit is you get exactly the same as the US, all the publications and support including future US modifications. Not sure if this is the case with P8 but I would suspect that USDOD is the Design Authority, not Boeing. This could be seen as an advantage.
It was interesting to note the recently released timescales, and a little disconcerting. Back in the old MPA thread there was a lot of traffic related to possible in service dates, with even pessimists talking of 2018/19. Now it seems we are talking of quote one ac in UK by back end of 2020 unquote.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Steady on chaps, look before you post. This thread was dormant for twelve months and we have people responding to old posts as if yesterday.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good point. And given that point, it shows just how utterly stoopid the early predictions were about a Trump presidency. The actual facts totally contradict those doom and gloom predictions.
Harry, comparing a paranoid crook to a naïve fool seems an odd juxtaposition, but I am drifting from the topic of the thread, which is that the P-8 seems to be alive and well despite attempts to distract/divert, and no the P-8 was never under threat.
Old news Chevron. President Trump already declared victory by getting the cost down on the AF1 program, and the Air Force issued the initial contract for the design for the conversion of the two airframes a few months ago.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the record, Boeing received a contract from USAF to purchase two "white tail" 747-8I originally built for a Russian company. So the next Air Force Ones will have started out as Russian aircraft. USAF got a really sweet deal on the planes. But the real money is not in building the airframes. The real money will be in modifying them. Boeing is almost certainly going to get that deal. And hopefully it'll happen here in San Antonio. That's where the current VC-25s and E-4s undergo depot maintenance/mod.