Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Falklands anyone?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Falklands anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2015, 17:36
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Maybe they are just passing by and think "f@ck it. Let's just bomb them"
Ha ha- where I grew up that's probably how the pub scenario would go too!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 17:50
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
I got into a lot of trouble as a Canadian Navy Midshipman during the first go. My request for Falklands OJT with the RN got passed to Naval HQ without any adults looking at it first. Their Lordships were not amused
Big Pistons Forever is online now  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 20:10
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Is that SAMXXV person trying to discuss turbine modulations and their appearance on the (ancient) PD search radar display in fighters such as the F-4?

Or simply spouting utter bolleaux?

I'm disposed towards the latter.
BEagle is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 20:54
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Wonder how long it will be 'til a Bear overflies the islands"

Why bother - everything is parked in the same places most of the time and you can see that from the weekly LAN Chile flight.....................
Well obviously no military reason. It would of course be a political act.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 21:50
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Argentina
Age: 48
Posts: 132
Received 45 Likes on 13 Posts
Nice, an early April´s fool!

What´s next, martians invading Liverpool?
Marcantilan is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 22:36
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Doubt it. Their spacecraft would be up on bricks with the wheels nicked before they could say

"Take me to your.....oi! b@stards!!... no, not you, sorry. Can you take me to your nearest tyre shop?"
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 22:39
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SAMXXV
How about Courtney Mil who although not being a back seater (Whoops, sorry, Weapons Operator) knows all about "A" Scope radar returns!
Er, yeah. A Scope. Frequency against amplitude. Good for ECM. Gets in the way of targets on the left side of the scope. Helps show where MBC is. Later generation radars, good confirmation of where a target sits in terms of Vc. Even later generation radars, not displayed because it's processed more effectively.

If we're talking about turbine mods, I'm not sure if we are, that is processed by by other circuits now. Kind of NCTR, EID stuff.

Maybe we're talking target detection? I honestly don't know from the question. Done my best to answer. Happy to help more if there's a more specific question.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 22:41
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
...oh, and welcome back. You've been gone for well over a year. Hope all is well.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 00:19
  #49 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAM,


I heartily endorse CM's welcome, our village is now back to full strength!


O-P


Oh, can you explain the bit about CW and 6 NM again please, I thought there was a RADAR eqn that covered that based on physics?


CM,


I watched a FA2 video that tracked the AIM 120 fly-out on the A-scope and also as a TWS tgt. F'in impressive!


O-P
O-P is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 00:28
  #50 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 49
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So was the statement finally made? Anything new?

Before Fallon´s speech I heard the Chinook Flight was to come back south after almost 10 ten years. Is that it? No E-3, no River-Joint... not even an extra pair of Typhs?

And that single deployment´s going to imply 20 million pounds a year to the british tax-payers?

Is not something wrong when a press headline forces governments to act in weird ways? Could it be that we´ll be reading in the papers something about weapons of mass destruction in some argentinean hide-out within five years? What would then be stated in the "Defense Review"?
CAW is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 00:37
  #51 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAW,


You live in a land where the government acts in 'weird ways', you tell us what the press thinks!


Please, tell us what your Defence review will give your armed forces? Will it be a bunch of crapped out leased SU 24s or some lifex Kfirs?
O-P is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 00:51
  #52 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 49
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding this particular topic it´s pretty obvious that the country run by the press head-lines is not Argentina.

I admit that there´s a chance that actually the british press (or the american for the matter) could be a branch of the Government... But History tends to show me otherwise.

As for the second question, I´ll surely dissapoint you: none of the above will be flying argentinean flags. Neither soon nor ever.

Again I tell you, the press lies to you. They just simplify things to an extreme that an alliance between russians, Yedis, Yodas and argentineans to recreate a proper scenario for Operation Corporate II -The Definite Challenge, will be their next headline.

Freedom of speech means that you can read whatever anyone puts out. But don´t forget that freedom of speech is firstly the freedom of the owner of the press to say whatever he wants. No proof, no real sources, no truth needed.

Just like this fantastic tale of the argentinean build-up that we read as a saga since a couple of year back.

Last edited by CAW; 25th Mar 2015 at 01:09.
CAW is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 01:22
  #53 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAW,


I have no idea what you have just blathered on about.


With the exception of the BBC, all the UK press is independently owned. The BBC is funded by the UK government, but controlled by an independent board.


How is the press in the former Spanish colony controlled?
O-P is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 01:46
  #54 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 49
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My friend, I know my english is not that good and I apologize for that. If you want me to I can translate my previous post to spanish.

As for the press in the "former spanish colony" if that`s meant to be offensive (shall we refer to England as te former french britain? or the US as the former british colony?) it`s clearly private owned.

Just like in Britain or in the states the press happens to have economic interests which makes them act in -again- "weird ways". You might remember this:

"But beneath Murdoch's public meltdown lies a bigger problem, and it’s not confined to England... It’s about what happens when media corporations get too cozy with power — and government officials fail to challenge them."

Rupert Murdoch Scandal | Free Press

Or closely in time:

Brian Williams Takes Leave as NBC Anchor Amid Controversy

Brian Williams Takes Leave as NBC Anchor Amid Controversy - Bloomberg Business

It`s the press!! That`s all there is to this topic. Why is The Sun printing these fake-news... just beats me. I can assure you that`s not because it is seeking the truth. It`s more likely "modeling a truth" creating a "common sense" that forces the G`ment to act in ways that go beyond my capacity of speculation.

I wonder if it has something to do with this:



David Cameron dismisses concerns over UK defence cuts - BBC News

Cheers!!
CAW is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 09:17
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Their Target for Tonight
Posts: 582
Received 28 Likes on 4 Posts
CAW,

You are absolutely right to point out that, irrespective of ownership, a nation's press is not necessarily representative of its best qualities!

I would be interested in your prespective on the current national sentiment in Argentina. Would there be any significant support for military action to change the sovereignty of the islands?
Red Line Entry is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 09:58
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can I just point out that the stories about the Su 24s originated in Argentina some time ago.
I just thought I'd mention it as some posters appear to think it's a story from an agenda laden UK media.

It's also worth noting that many say the stories started on December 28th 2014 (CAW, you know the importance of that day) and that many Argentinians see the story as just a political joke that shouldn't be taken seriously.
It must also be noted that the Argentinian Government aren't saying the story is incorrect...........politicians and their self aggrandisement, they are the same the world over
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 15:55
  #57 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 49
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red Line Entry

There`s not a chance that the argentinean government could mount a military action against the british military garrison in the islands. There`s no political will to do so, there`s no military capacity to garantee a quick, swift victory, there`s no a single political party that speaks out loud about the need to solve the Malvinas issue by force.

There is a strong sentiment towards Malvinas but it doesn`t necessarily mean that argentineans demand military action to expel the british. It wasn`t like that back in 1982 and it`s not like that nowadays.

Barnstormer,

The SU24 story DID NOT ORIGINATE in Argentina. It was another one of those Sun Headlines. The buttom line of the supposed deal was so fantastic and unreal that I just can`t believe that serious informed people still believe it to be true.

In case you did not know when Argentina decided to get some russian equipment, payments were cashed in hard currency. Cows are no longer something that mean big economic revenues for the local economy not to mention that they are barely enough to deal with the local-yearly demand of meat for human consumption.
CAW is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 16:03
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
The SU24 story DID NOT ORIGINATE in Argentina. It was another one of those Sun Headlines. The buttom line of the supposed deal was so fantastic and unreal that I just can`t believe that serious informed people still believe it to be true.
It actually originated in the Express. The reporter doesn't actually appear to attribute his/her information to any particular source, and reading the article it could have come from Russia/Argentina/MOD.

Falkland Islands defence review after military deal between Russia and Argentina | UK | News | Daily Express

Although highly unlikely, the proposed deal is really not "so fantastic and unreal" to be discounted completely.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 16:18
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the support shown to the Yanks (ops Telic, Herrick et. al.), even IF the Argies were prepared to bankrupt themselves for a crappy piece of dirt that really means nothing to anyone bar 'national pride', and even IF the UK couldn't meet said threat with superior force, surely good friends from across the ditch would step in and lend a hand. Wouldn't they?
Hempy is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2015, 17:47
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our own press are far from independent though is it? they all have their own agendas, and are very capable of whipping up hysteria for the masses, at their masters request (and at times I've fell for it, I admit it).
Recent UK Govt statements struck me as total cojones, spewed out because of the general election and they have to try and look hard.
Hangarshuffle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.