HMS Dauntless...
Dog Tired
Thread Starter
Fantom, "oh goody here we go" really?
Goody 1: We still have something to send,
Goody 2: It is being sent to protect our interests.
Or would you rather we do nothing?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Age: 61
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Much too much being read into this. According to the BBC story, Dauntless will be routinely deployed to the Falklands in due course.
So, just like HMS Montrose replaced HMS Edinburgh at the end of last year, it sounds like Dauntless will be here when the Montrose has done her time.
So, just like HMS Montrose replaced HMS Edinburgh at the end of last year, it sounds like Dauntless will be here when the Montrose has done her time.
Suspicion breeds confidence
Enemy only understands one thing which is force and the willingness to use it. The govt are doing the right thing, lets make sure she's tool'd up for the job and let enemy see her off their coast.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the one hand it could be considered routine.
On the other hand we're replacing a T23 with a T45. Earlier posters in the other thread were commenting on the lack of air defence radar on the islands, Dauntless plugs that gap and allows us to monitor all air traffic right back to the mainland. That's not a replacement, that's an upgrade.
On the other hand we're replacing a T23 with a T45. Earlier posters in the other thread were commenting on the lack of air defence radar on the islands, Dauntless plugs that gap and allows us to monitor all air traffic right back to the mainland. That's not a replacement, that's an upgrade.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm given that T23 replaced T42, I don't see why replacing T23 with T45 is anything particularly significant given the numbers of T42 left...? As for lack of air defence radar, umm.... maybe I mistook those big golf balls in the hills for something else?
Originally Posted by Navaleye
It could sit 12 miles off any enemy airbase and splash anything that takes off. that should rattle their cages.
If it was too dangerous to even get airborne, I'd just park the jet on the end of the runway pointing out to sea, makes the Butt (sp?) switch and loose off a couple of anti-ship missiles if that were the case.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do hope the ijot who decided the Harriers' demise is shuffling nervously in the corridors of power.If it all kicks off and the Argies do lob one onto Stanleys runway scratch the use of 4 Typhoons..wheres our air defence then...you cant rely on one super sophisticated warship. I'd like to think some one somewhere is earning their pay and coming up with a preemptive plan....but somehow I think not...If there are huge oil reserves to be tapped into then we need to bolster the islands defences in the long term.Just how many aircraft could the type 45 defend at the same time anyway?
Quote:
Just how many aircraft could the type 45 defend at the same time anyway?
But, how many combat capable anti-ship aircraft could Argentina REALISTICALLY sortie at one time anyway?
Just how many aircraft could the type 45 defend at the same time anyway?
But, how many combat capable anti-ship aircraft could Argentina REALISTICALLY sortie at one time anyway?
HQ2,
depends how much warning they get, and how much they get to hit the credit card for spares.
despite all the nay-sayers about slagging the argentines down for being chaotic and unable to shoot themselves in the foot, let alone invade, there's only one country invovled in this dispute that has doubled its defence budget in the last two years, and they haven't bought any tanks.
the open sourse stuff i've read suggests twenty airworthy fast jets with 10 or so those at some degree or other of combat capability. the problem is of course that the FI AD set-up won't be able to tell which jets are merely airworthy, and which are dangerous. any RAF officer who couldn't come up with a plan to do the deed with those assets facing an adversary with four fast jets, probably quite restrictive ROE, one tanker, one runway and no AWACS ought to be applying for redundancy...
depends how much warning they get, and how much they get to hit the credit card for spares.
despite all the nay-sayers about slagging the argentines down for being chaotic and unable to shoot themselves in the foot, let alone invade, there's only one country invovled in this dispute that has doubled its defence budget in the last two years, and they haven't bought any tanks.
the open sourse stuff i've read suggests twenty airworthy fast jets with 10 or so those at some degree or other of combat capability. the problem is of course that the FI AD set-up won't be able to tell which jets are merely airworthy, and which are dangerous. any RAF officer who couldn't come up with a plan to do the deed with those assets facing an adversary with four fast jets, probably quite restrictive ROE, one tanker, one runway and no AWACS ought to be applying for redundancy...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: somewhere...everywhere
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it all kicks off and the Argies do lob one onto Stanleys runway scratch the use of 4 Typhoons..wheres our air defence then
If it all kicks off and the Argies do lob one onto Stanleys runway scratch the use of 4 Typhoons..wheres our air defence then
Probably operating from the same airfield that the AD force has been using for..oh..about 25 years. Clue..it's not Stanley.
Probably operating from the same airfield that the AD force has been using for..oh..about 25 years. Clue..it's not Stanley.
It's almost like they designed it that way
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not only that - MPA could take an absolute pounding before there isn't enough concrete left for a Typhoon to get airborne off a minimum operating strip. With the number of aircraft available to the Argies, airfield denial would need a comprehensive GPS-guided bomb plot to 'plink' all the critical intersections and taxyways. A 'lucky' bomb from a stick straddling the runway just won't cut it - success with dumb bombs would required dozens and dozens of missions to get over the target, highly unlikely I would suggest...
It's almost like they designed it that way
Probably did design it that way...........Which makes it such a shame that any attacker from any country (unless they were 'light blue' minded attackers) would not waste their time bothering to attack the concrete runway/taxiways.
It does get a bit silly listening to folks wondering how any baddies would prevent aircraft from operating by using other aircraft, when for many years there have been VERY cheap and VERY quick and easy ways to render all Falklands airfields useless for defence in about 10-20 minutes (by green minded attackers). Plus, by simply destrying aircraft on the ground, or as they leave the threshold it then leaves the strip usable for the new occupiers.
I have heard many stories from light blue or green airfield defenders how naughty men in cammed up faces can get in and around airfields pretty easily........I wonder if the Argentinians have thought about using men like this....Of course they have......And with modern kit they don't even have to get close to guarantee destroying the aircraft.
It's almost like they designed it that way
Probably did design it that way...........Which makes it such a shame that any attacker from any country (unless they were 'light blue' minded attackers) would not waste their time bothering to attack the concrete runway/taxiways.
It does get a bit silly listening to folks wondering how any baddies would prevent aircraft from operating by using other aircraft, when for many years there have been VERY cheap and VERY quick and easy ways to render all Falklands airfields useless for defence in about 10-20 minutes (by green minded attackers). Plus, by simply destrying aircraft on the ground, or as they leave the threshold it then leaves the strip usable for the new occupiers.
I have heard many stories from light blue or green airfield defenders how naughty men in cammed up faces can get in and around airfields pretty easily........I wonder if the Argentinians have thought about using men like this....Of course they have......And with modern kit they don't even have to get close to guarantee destroying the aircraft.