CAYNINE

Nope, haven't said anything defamatory, he was a senior joint director with BC (whom has been mentioned by name over and over) just stating that ALL the directors were playing God with others money and spinning a very convincing line to their colleagues and friends.

Just because BC, (don't say his name) is the sole remaining director doesn't mean that he made all the decisions. I would just like to know what transpired during the transactions that are being questioned as unusual, which, if it makes you happy Atiuda or whoever you pretend to be, why then does the unmentionable name appear as the signatory to one of the main dodgey deals in question???

If it makes you happy little guy I'll change it to your handle.

White Knight

It's ok Caynine; there was a post after yours which has been pulled, so I guess Atiuta wasn't referring to yours....

atiuta

Relax caynine. If you'd seen shitinhead's post, you would understand.

I don't disagree with your post at all. The post that was above mine, had taken a rather large step over an ethical line regardless of the subject individuals possible involvement with the thread subject. To be honest, it fell into the category of pot....kettle....black. Despicable, low, nasty, unsubstantiated accusations on personal medical issues that had no relationship to the threads theme. A vain attempt was made to claim personal dislikes were not a factor.

By in large, I could never be bothered to read or attempt to understand shitinhead's lunatic raving in the past. I just considered his post to be in the grounds of legal defamation and completely unethical. For his sake I hope he retains his anonymity.

One could argue that my terms are defamatory but there's a big difference between legal defamation and calling someone a loser. Prune or to his face, the message will be the same.

I reiterate, this is not about any ex directors actions. It's the fact that someone could stoop that low and still claim the moral high ground.