First Yammer victim.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Tea time.
Having now read the post, I can't see why MH got so upset. It's the real truth of what we're putting up with on the line every day.
Unless of course MH doesn't want to hear the truth......
Having now read the post, I can't see why MH got so upset. It's the real truth of what we're putting up with on the line every day.
Unless of course MH doesn't want to hear the truth......
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sector C
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The UK fatigue expert involved with the survey commented that he had not seen an airline with such complexity in rostering" GMF. HC.
If the "expert" had not seen something like CX before, probably means they never seen any mainline airline before.
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When PWC came in they said the CX operation was simple and easy to implement a new computerised rostering system compared to other like American Airlines which have far more bases, and aircraft types, flights, destinations, and passengers, FAA, and negotiated rules.
If the "expert" had not seen something like CX before, probably means they never seen any mainline airline before.
If the "expert" had not seen something like CX before, probably means they never seen any mainline airline before.
Perhaps he meant a system that was so simple yet had been made overly complex for no good reason.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here ---> X
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's what you DON'T say that they find interesting.
You have to hand it to them, they have mastered the art of corporate villainy. In fact, I think Swire might have written that manual.