Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Unsupervised working

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2014, 11:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Age: 51
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Unsupervised working

Can anyone please clarify if unlicensed mechanics/fitters can legally work without licensed engineers present in the hangar or allocated to the aircraft being worked?
Also surely there is a safety aspect too?

Thanks
northernmonkeyninja is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 15:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

you don't actually need LAE's in a hangar, as the only CRS req'd is at the end by the C person. However practicality dictates that companies do have LAE's on the shop floor. Supervision is based on knowledge and experience of the fitter, anything from 10% to 100% as you deem necessary.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 16:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: LHR
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unsupervised working

I see no reason why a mechanic can't do work on their own without an LAE over their shoulder. It more depends on your trust as an LAE in them. A tyre change for example wouldn't need an LAE standing around if you've got an experienced Mech team doing it, but if it's a new guy or an apprentice it might be prudent obviously.

There is a safety aspect if someone doesn't have a clue what they are doing but that applies to LAEs too !!

Safe flying
Tech log
Tech_Log is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 17:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is no legal requirement to have regulated supervision of unlicensed personnel in the UK. The licensed engineer who certifies any work carried out by such personnel takes responsibility for the tasks.

Certainly, in most situations licensed staff will always be on duty with unlicensed mechs.
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 18:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

a wheel change these days is covered by a cat A so would need no LAE at all.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 19:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To certify an "A" task requires an EASA A License (where I work anyway!)
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 21:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

yes but an A licenced mechanic can only certify their own work nobody elses. In the olden days it was 'limited and simple'! Only a B licenced engineer (technician) can sign for work done by others.
An A licence is for line work not hangar stuff!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2014, 22:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm...Fully aware of the scope of an A Licence....it was mentioned that there was no need for an LAE for A tasks (An "A" license holder is a Licensed Engineer!)
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2014, 07:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: england
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certifying Mechanic's Work.

Within BA, Mechanics require constant supervision by an LAE.
yotty is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2014, 08:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

An A licence is a line maintenance mechanic! Not an Engineer, they can not issue a CRS for other peoples work or do trouble shooting they can only do minor scheduled maintenance i.e transit/daily/weekly and approved tasks that only they have carried out.


PART-66 /JAR-66.A.20 Privileges



(a) Subject to compliance with paragraph (b), the following privileges shall apply:

1. A category A PART-66 /JAR-66 Aircraft Maintenance License permits the holder to issue certificates of release to service following minor scheduled line maintenance and simple defect rectification within the limits of tasks specifically endorsed on the authorization. The certification privileges shall be restricted to work that the Licence holder has personally performed in a Part-145 organization.

2. A category B1 PART-66 /JAR-66 Aircraft Maintenance License shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service following maintenance, including aircraft structure, powerplant and mechanical and electrical systems. Replacement of avionic line replaceable units, requiring simple tests to prove their serviceability, shall also be included in the privileges. Category B1 shall automatically include the appropriate A subcategory.

3. A category B2 PART-66 /JAR-66 Aircraft Maintenance License shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service following maintenance on avionic and electrical systems.

4. A category C PART-66 /JAR-66 Aircraft Maintenance Licence shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service following base maintenance on aircraft. The privileges apply to the aircraft in its entirety in a Part-145 organization.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2014, 09:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mechanic or Engineer......What difference does a title make?!...A lot depends on what country you are working in!

Those of us in the industry fully know what an A License holder can and can't do!!...At the end of the day they hold a license and therefore are not unlicensed personnel....which is what the original question was asking.

The title "engineer" was dropped from UK issued licenses (including B1's) when EASA Part 66 licenses started being issued.
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2014, 10:17
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Age: 51
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thx for all inputs... My current quality dept states there is no such thing as "oversigning" a mechanics task.
Just wondered how other companies are getting by...?
Company says one thing but wants us to act another! Sound familiar.
northernmonkeyninja is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2014, 14:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The important issue is that the person carrying out work is competent to do that work whether they are unlicensed or licensed staff. 145.A.30 (e) requires the MRO to establish and control the competence of persons involved in all aspects of maintenance. The AMC goes on to explain that the procedure should ensure the competence of all staff before they carry out unsupervised work, this includes certifying staff. A licence does not automatically equate to competence.
happybiker is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2014, 21:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing Eng,
Actually not, my current UK BCAR licence issued by the CAA states "Aircraft Maintenance Engineer's Licence" at the top.
om15 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2014, 21:27
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just like my good old Section L license.....(ah the delights of oral exams!).....So, to clarify....UK issued EASA 66 Licenses!
boeing_eng is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.