PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th Oct 2007, 10:58   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
What Cockpit? MK VI

Aargh! Wimping out, can't find anything worthy right now

Try this, Mel and Bri give em a chance please






Continuation of: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...46#post3655246

Last edited by Kitbag; 24th Oct 2007 at 11:48.
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 12:55   #2 (permalink)
Blame My Parrot
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerdorset, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 217
Total stab in the dark - T38/F5?
VitaminGee is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 13:05   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
VG, nope, not a lightweight fighter.
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 13:12   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bedford
Posts: 215
Is it a Lockheed U2?
oncemorealoft is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 13:43   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Back in the real world....
Posts: 2,498
Is it a Sea Vixen or at least a jet of that era?
LowNSlow is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 14:36   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
Not a Lockheed product, although the right side of the pond. Surprisingly this ac is earlier than the Sea Vixen
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 15:25   #7 (permalink)
Blame My Parrot
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerdorset, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 217
Version of the Douglas Skyraider (or similar)?
VitaminGee is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 15:26   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 73
Posts: 4,515
Kitbag

No problem, well done on the last one
Mel
MReyn24050 is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 15:39   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
VG, nope, definitely a twin with no big cooling fans on the front, although criticised at the time for being underpowered, then again most aircraft of this era were.
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 18:11   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 289
Underpowered makes me think of the F-89 Scorpion.
innuendo is online now   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 19:28   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 18,734
Chance-Vought F7U Cutlass....


One of the more flattering shots of the 'Gutless'!
BEagle is offline   Reply
Old 24th Oct 2007, 21:51   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
Beags has it- specifically one of only 12 F7U3P recce variants built:



The reheated Westinghouse engines were planned to produce c10000 lbs thrust but were derated to less than 5000lbs. Not good on a carrier, one of the limitations was a requirement to disengage reheat as soon as the aircraft left the deck. It was said that the toasters made by Westinghouse produced more heat than the Cutlass' engines. The two ac shown by Beags in Blue Angels markings were solo performerswhilst the rest of the team formed up and I read somewhere that in 5 years of service (1954-1959) the attrition rate was in the region of 25%. Still, it was a fascinating shape in a period of experimentation.

To you BEagle.
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 06:45   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 18,734
Another oddity:

BEagle is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 09:57   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
Twin engine jet with 'afterburner' so probably US origin. No fixed windscreen, but looks sharp and pointy. Had thought of Douglas X3 Stilleto, but am now plumping for the Convair Sea Dart as I have convinced myself the aircraft appears to be on a slipway.
Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 11:49   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 73
Posts: 4,515
Beagle's challenge

I think you are spot on with your second choice kitbag.
MReyn24050 is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 14:36   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 73
Posts: 4,515
Latest update of What Cockpits published to date.

This list includes all challenges from What Cockpit I to What Cockpit VI.
http://www.geocities.com/artificer35...007.htm?200725
MReyn24050 is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 14:43   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 18,734
Yep - Convair Sea Dart it is!

The world's only supersonic seaplane.

And, as far as I'm aware, the only supersonic tail-dragger! Tips of the hydroskis had small wheels as did the rear fuselage.

YHC!!
BEagle is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 15:08   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,199
I think both the Gutless and the Sea Dart had the same engines, as well as the XF88 which went on to develop into the F101 Voodoo. Anyway try this homebuild next:

Kitbag is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 15:52   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 73
Posts: 4,515
Kitbag's challenge

Please check PMs
Mel
MReyn24050 is offline   Reply
Old 25th Oct 2007, 15:54   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 687
Rutan Long-Eze?
Fitter2 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".