PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Forgotten your Username/Password?

African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 15:11   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Lusaka and Joburg
Posts: 218
Emirates Blows an engine out of Lusaka

Just happened to be in Lusaka for the day and saw a wounded A330-200 on the apron.
Picked up a local paper and after cutting out 10 paragraphs of the screaming passengers, engine in flames and "I thought I was going to die" reportage it appears the 'facts ' are:-
EK 714 outbound from Lusaka to Dubai 2300 Sunday Night.
Reached cruising altitude 34000 ft. 64 nm & 30 mins after take off there was a loud bang and the aircraft shook.
The aircarft returned to Lusaka and made a normal landing and taxied to the apron.
It appears three blades snapped off and blew a hole in the nacelle (port side).
An engine fire was contained by the engine fire extinguishers.
Rolls Royce and EK engineers are on the scene.
Well done crew. Ops Normal
Flying Bean is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 16:01   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: England
Age: 68
Posts: 109
Flying Bean the 'facts@ are: 64n and 30mins after take off.

That is impressive, flying for 30 minutes at an average 128 knts way, way below stalling speed. Anymore "facts"?
Shytehawk is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 16:10   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 734
Quote:
The manufacturers are “seriously concerned” about the fault because it is the first time an airbus 330-200 has developed such a serious fault which could be a manufacturing error, the sources said.
Engine failure .......... aircraft manufacturing error? A bit of a non-sequitur?

Quote:
One of the passengers who sought anonymity, said the plane departed from Kenneth Kaunda International Airport around 21:00 hours but got “stuck” in one position in the air for some minutes.
She said the aircraft shook abnormally as it landed on the runway as some passengers panicked.
I think I'd 'seek anonymity' if I made a comment like that too!

It's a HRE originating flight and I believe a friend of mine was on it. If so, I'll post her account of it when I hear from here, as she is a very rational and level-headed person.
Tableview is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 16:14   #4 (permalink)
1jz
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 28
Posts: 44
i may be wrong but, is there a SID etc that may have taken time n thats why airplane didnt travel far off.. or a 100kts Jet stream at lower level acting like a headwind.
1jz is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 16:34   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: British Virgin Islands
Posts: 52
747 bringing new engine in just now and they are replacing tonight. Stand by photos....
sicamore is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2012, 11:44   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LOS
Age: 29
Posts: 171
Tableview

Blades snapping off and hole(s) in nacelle hardly qualifies as an engine failure. More like severe damage.
eagleflier is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2012, 21:21   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I don't even know anymore
Posts: 55
Quote:
Blades snapping off and hole(s) in nacelle hardly qualifies as an engine failure. More like severe damage.
WHAT!! You have to be kidding me right!?

Holes in the nacelle means the blades that did snap off didn't stay inside the engine. That is usually called an "un-contained engine failure"... Quite serious stuff indeed, especially if that blade decided to break off in such a point of its rotation that it got aimed at the fuselage, a passenger's head or any major structural parts.
Plore is offline   Reply
Old 9th Nov 2012, 16:12   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: through the door, left
Posts: 112
Plore, if the engine stopped (= failed) due to the blades braking off, it's an engine failure.

If the engine had to be shut down due the damage caused by the blades failure, it is an in-flight shut down due to severe damage.
DaFly is offline   Reply
Old 9th Nov 2012, 20:00   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I don't even know anymore
Posts: 55
Actually not quite DaFly. As also explained on wikipedia...

Quote:
A turbine engine failure refers to an incident wherein a turbine engine in an aircraft unexpectedly stops producing power because of a part malfunction, in the absence of circumstances such as fuel exhaustion.
As you can see mentioned there, its a failure if the engine stopped producing power, not just stopped. I would guess with several blades missing the engine would stop producing power.

Under the heading 'Things that are not failures' they also mention...

Quote:
A compressor surge is a disruption of the airflow through a gas turbine engine that can be caused by engine deterioration, a crosswind over the engine’s inlet, ingestion of foreign material, or an internal component failure (a thing that is of course a failure, or, not not a failure) such as a broken blade.
Of all the examples mentioned they state that only the blade failure is considered an engine failure and not just an engine shut down.
Plore is offline   Reply
Old 9th Nov 2012, 21:00   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,037
Oh great, we're quoting Wikipedia now as a source of info. Long ago the difference was explained to me as:

Engine failure - The fire's gone out, get the checklist and see if we can relight it.

Severe damage - No N1, no N2 or no oil pressure (either 0 or the indication missing on these new fancy planes) or abnormal vibration. It's R&R time.
MarkerInbound is offline   Reply
Old 9th Nov 2012, 22:55   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,538
Quote:
Anymore "facts"?
I thought the same Shytehawk - but 34000' in 64 miles is a pretty unfeasible climb gradient too. On second thoughts, at 120kts and 30 mins its only 1000fpm. Someone not been thinking before splurging out nonsensical numbers I fear.

Still, I just read the title and thought, a bit short on accuracy here - what was Lusaka doing with an engine, and why did Emirates have to blow it somewhere else? Couldn't they have just taken it away in a truck like everyone else does? Well, that's what it says...


If people don't read what they've written to see that it actually says what was intended they are likely to write something totally different to what was intended, as in the utterly bizarre title of this thread. And that's just where the bolleaux started...

Last edited by Agaricus bisporus; 9th Nov 2012 at 23:00.
Agaricus bisporus is offline   Reply
Old 14th Nov 2012, 20:06   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: On the wrong side of the equator
Posts: 54
ahaha you didn't take into account of the 200kts hw on the way ou and on the way back
tempesta is offline   Reply
Old 19th Nov 2012, 15:24   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 197
Malfunctions from inferior designs are common

Clearly upgrading these substandard fans with superior Pratt & Whitney’s would be the proper corrective action.
Temp Spike is offline   Reply
Old 20th Nov 2012, 17:28   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Far Away
Posts: 4
Also the pilot probably shut the engine down... losing a single blade would severely unbalance the engine, with it possibly tearing itself to pieces and anything close by.

Last edited by vanjast; 20th Nov 2012 at 17:30.
vanjast is offline   Reply
Old 18th Dec 2012, 03:34   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Lusaka and Joburg
Posts: 218
Emirates Engines

I just saw on Rumours forum.
Emirates engine problems out of Sydney.
There have been three separate engine incidents with Emirates in November, although not of the same engine type.
Flying Bean is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 20:46.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network